Pete French wrote:
Ok, thats a bit worry if true - but I can confirm that l2arc works fine
under 10.3 on amd64, so what you say about cross-compling might be true.
Am taking an inetrest in this as I have just dpeloyed a lot of machines
which are going to be relying on l2arc working to get
On 12/10/2016 23:18, Peter wrote:
> Details:
> After upgrading 2 machines from 9.3 to 10.3-STABLE, on one of them the
> l2arc stays empty (capacity alloc = 0), although it is online and gets
> accessed. It did work well on 9.3.
>
> I did the following tests:
> * Create a zpool on a stick, with
Ok, thats a bit worry if true - but I can confirm that l2arc works fine
under 10.3 on amd64, so what you say about cross-compling might be true.
Am taking an inetrest in this as I have just dpeloyed a lot of machines
which are going to be relying on l2arc working to get reasobale performance.
Details:
After upgrading 2 machines from 9.3 to 10.3-STABLE, on one of them the
l2arc stays empty (capacity alloc = 0), although it is online and gets
accessed. It did work well on 9.3.
I did the following tests:
* Create a zpool on a stick, with two volumes: one filesystem and one
cache.
