net; z...@physik.tu-berlin.de;
st...@physik.tu-berlin.de
Subject: Re: kernel process [nfscl] high cpu
Hi,
(I'm not on this list, please CC me in future replies.
My apologies to those who get this message twice, I had a typo in the
To: header, and have to re-send it to the list.)
sorry for reviving
Hi,
(I'm not on this list, please CC me in future replies.
My apologies to those who get this message twice, I had a typo in the
To: header, and have to re-send it to the list.)
sorry for reviving such an old thread, but I've run into this problem
lately as well, on a 11.1-RELEASE-p1 jailhost
Frank de Bot wrote:
> Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Frank de Bot wrote:
> >> Rick Macklem wrote:
> >>> Frank de Bot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a 10.1-RELEASE-p9 server I have several NFS mounts used for a
> jail.
> Because it's a server only to test, there is a low load. But the
>
Rick Macklem wrote:
> Frank de Bot wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On a 10.1-RELEASE-p9 server I have several NFS mounts used for a
>> jail.
>> Because it's a server only to test, there is a low load. But the
>> [nfscl]
>> process is hogging a CPU after a while. This happens pretty fast,
>> within
>> 1 or 2
Rick Macklem wrote:
> Frank de Bot wrote:
>> Rick Macklem wrote:
>>> Frank de Bot wrote:
Hi,
On a 10.1-RELEASE-p9 server I have several NFS mounts used for a
jail.
Because it's a server only to test, there is a low load. But the
[nfscl]
process is hogging a CPU
Frank de Bot wrote:
> Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Frank de Bot wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On a 10.1-RELEASE-p9 server I have several NFS mounts used for a
> >> jail.
> >> Because it's a server only to test, there is a low load. But the
> >> [nfscl]
> >> process is hogging a CPU after a while. This
Frank de Bot wrote:
> Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Frank de Bot wrote:
> >> Rick Macklem wrote:
> >>> Frank de Bot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a 10.1-RELEASE-p9 server I have several NFS mounts used for a
> jail.
> Because it's a server only to test, there is a low load. But the
>
Frank de Bot wrote:
> Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Frank de Bot wrote:
> >> Rick Macklem wrote:
> >>> Frank de Bot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a 10.1-RELEASE-p9 server I have several NFS mounts used for a
> jail.
> Because it's a server only to test, there is a low load. But the
>
Frank de Bot wrote:
Hi,
On a 10.1-RELEASE-p9 server I have several NFS mounts used for a
jail.
Because it's a server only to test, there is a low load. But the
[nfscl]
process is hogging a CPU after a while. This happens pretty fast,
within
1 or 2 days. I'm noticing the high CPU of the
