> The interrupted system calls (EINTR returned from select()) are normal.
> Notice that each time it happens, it's associated with a SIGALARM being
> delivered to ntpd. Ntpd uses SIGALARM at 1hz to periodically get
> control and decide whether it's time to poll peers and do other
> periodic work.
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 07:49 +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> Ian, Good points. I did remove the fudge and 127.127.1.1 lines from the
> config with the same result as below. Interestingly the clock at 10.0.7.6
> isn't really unreliable, as its been my time source since 2005, and serves
>
Ian, Good points. I did remove the fudge and 127.127.1.1 lines from the
config with the same result as below. Interestingly the clock at 10.0.7.6
isn't really unreliable, as its been my time source since 2005, and serves
clients, so it is pretty ok. Without a local clock, named fails (its
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 16:37 +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> I usually run ntpd with both aslr and as user ntpd. While testing I
> noticed that my server with a direct network cable to my main time keeper,
> jumped from the expected stratum 2 to 14 as follows (I record the date so I
> can synch
Hi,
> On 5 Mar 2020, at 06:33, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> Hi Dewayne,
>
> Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately, I can't really suggest anything -
> it's not clear to me why ntpd would prefer a stratum 14 clock over a
> stratum 2 clock. Have you tried looking through the debugging hints
> page
Hi Dewayne,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately, I can't really suggest anything -
it's not clear to me why ntpd would prefer a stratum 14 clock over a
stratum 2 clock. Have you tried looking through the debugging hints
page (https://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/debug.html)?
I haven't
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 06:43, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2020-Feb-26 16:37:43 +1100, Dewayne Geraghty
> wrote:
> >I usually run ntpd with both aslr and as user ntpd. While testing I
> >noticed that my server with a direct network cable to my main time keeper,
> >jumped from the expected stratum
On 2020-Feb-26 16:37:43 +1100, Dewayne Geraghty
wrote:
>I usually run ntpd with both aslr and as user ntpd. While testing I
>noticed that my server with a direct network cable to my main time keeper,
>jumped from the expected stratum 2 to 14 as follows (I record the date so I
>can synch with
