On Jun 25, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Damjan Marion wrote:
>> I see 3 options to fix this:
>>
>> 1. Ask clang folks to patch llvm to use old mnemonics ("mov r0, r0, rrx"
>> instead of "rrx r0,r0")
>> 2. Maintain same patch for freebsd only
>> 3. patch binuti
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Damjan Marion wrote:
> I see 3 options to fix this:
>
> 1. Ask clang folks to patch llvm to use old mnemonics ("mov r0, r0, rrx"
> instead of "rrx r0,r0")
> 2. Maintain same patch for freebsd only
> 3. patch binutils to support this new mnemonics
4. Finally upgrade to a m
On Jun 25, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Damjan Marion wrote:
>> I see 3 options to fix this:
>>
>> 1. Ask clang folks to patch llvm to use old mnemonics ("mov r0, r0, rrx"
>> instead of "rrx r0,r0")
>> 2. Maintain same patch for freebsd only
>> 3. patch binuti