On Apr 29, 2012, at 9:43 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 03:33:49PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> I've been testing the follow-fork changes in GDB and ran into some weird
>> behavior. Without gdb, my test program (attached) prints something like:
>>
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:43:22 +0300
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:59:00AM +0100, John Marino wrote:
> > Hi Konstantin,
> >
> > It seems that no BSD supported DT_GNU_HASH despite this option
> > being available on the base binutils (FreeBSD's 2.17.50 binutils
> > supports
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 03:33:49PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I've been testing the follow-fork changes in GDB and ran into some weird
> behavior. Without gdb, my test program (attached) prints something like:
>
> fbsdvm% ./fe
> fe(41042): initial process. Doing fork &