Whatever the command line arguments, running c89 almost always results in
the following output. Anyone else seeing this?
c89: illegal option -- 1
usage: c89 [-cEgOs] [-D name[=value]] ... [-I directory] ... [-L directory] ...
[-o outfile] [-U name] ... operand ...
where operand
On 2013-03-07 18:24, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
Whatever the command line arguments, running c89 almost always results in
the following output. Anyone else seeing this?
c89: illegal option -- 1
usage: c89 [-cEgOs] [-D name[=value]] ... [-I directory] ... [-L directory] ...
[-o outfile]
On 7 Mar 2013, at 19:28, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
Also, I seem to remember a discussion about making -std=gnu89 the default
for clang when run as cc, but nothing seems to have changed. Could this
be picked up again, because there are in fact subtle semantic differences
between
On 2013-03-07 20:28, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2013-03-07 18:24, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
Whatever the command line arguments, running c89 almost always results in
the following output. Anyone else seeing this?
c89: illegal option -- 1
usage: c89 [-cEgOs] [-D name[=value]] ... [-I directory] ...
On 2013-03-07 21:22, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
...
Because it's the practical thing to do? Old code/makefiles can't possibly
be expected to know about compilers of the future, while new code can be
expected to add -std=c11.
I am not sure I buy that argument; if it were so, we should default to
KR
On Mar 7, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2013-03-07 21:22, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
...
Because it's the practical thing to do? Old code/makefiles can't possibly
be expected to know about compilers of the future, while new code can be
expected to add -std=c11.
I am not sure I
On 2013-03-07 22:36, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 7, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2013-03-07 21:22, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
...
Because it's the practical thing to do? Old code/makefiles can't possibly
be expected to know about compilers of the future, while new code can be
expected
On 7 March 2013 18:03, Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote:
On 2013-03-07 22:36, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 7, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2013-03-07 21:22, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
...
Because it's the practical thing to do? Old code/makefiles can't possibly
be expected to
