On Jul 11, 2013, at 19:19, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 11/07/2013 19:43 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>
>> buildword was run as make -j8 buildworld and the it mysteriously failed like
>> this:
>>
>> sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 444 liblwres.so.80
>> /usr/obj/usr/src/
on 11/07/2013 19:43 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>
> buildword was run as make -j8 buildworld and the it mysteriously failed like
> this:
>
> sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 444 liblwres.so.80
> /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib
> sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -l s liblwres
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, David Chisnall wrote:
On 11 Jul 2013, at 13:11, Bruce Evans wrote:
The error message for the __builtin_isnan() version is slightly better up
to where it says more.
The less-unportable macro can do more classification and detect problems
at compile time using __typeof().
buildword was run as make -j8 buildworld and the it mysteriously failed like
this:
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 444 liblwres.so.80
/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -l s liblwres.so.80
/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/liblwres.so
1 error
*** [librar
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, David Chisnall wrote:
On 11 Jul 2013, at 13:11, Bruce Evans wrote:
is also not required to be conforming C code, let alone C++ code,
so there is only a practical requirement that it works when included
in the C++ implementation.
Working with the C++ implementation is t
On 11 Jul 2013, at 13:11, Bruce Evans wrote:
> The error message for the __builtin_isnan() version is slightly better up
> to where it says more.
>
> The less-unportable macro can do more classification and detect problems
> at compile time using __typeof().
The attached patch fixes the related
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-07-11 06:21, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Garrett Wollman wrote:
< said:
I think isnan(double) and isinf(double) in math.h should only be
visible if (_BSD_VISIBLE || _XSI_VISIBLE) && __ISO_C_VISIBLE < 1999.
For C99 and higher there
On 11 Jul 2013, at 13:11, Bruce Evans wrote:
> is also not required to be conforming C code, let alone C++ code,
> so there is only a practical requirement that it works when included
> in the C++ implementation.
Working with the C++ implementation is the problem that we are trying to solve.
>
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, David Chisnall wrote:
You're joining in this discussion starting in the middle, so you probably
missed the earlier explanation.
I was mainly addressing a C99 point. I know little about C++ or C11.
On 11 Jul 2013, at 05:21, Bruce Evans wrote:
I don't see how any conf
On 2013-07-11 06:21, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>> < said:
>>> I think isnan(double) and isinf(double) in math.h should only be
>>> visible if (_BSD_VISIBLE || _XSI_VISIBLE) && __ISO_C_VISIBLE < 1999.
>>> For C99 and higher there should only be the isnan/isinf
Hi Bruce,
You're joining in this discussion starting in the middle, so you probably
missed the earlier explanation.
On 11 Jul 2013, at 05:21, Bruce Evans wrote:
> I don't see how any conforming program can access the isnan() function
> directly. It is just as protected as __isnan() would be.
11 matches
Mail list logo