Re: GCC withdraw

2013-08-31 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Sorry for adding to the long thread. On Sat, 31 Aug 2013, David Chisnall wrote: However, we want to be able to make it unsupported at some point in the 10.x series when there is a polished alternative for every supported architecture (either when they've moved to clang or when the XCC stuff

Re: GCC withdraw

2013-08-31 Thread David Chisnall
On 31 Aug 2013, at 08:33, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Why didn't this come up when John added XSAVE (a year ago) or Pedro > Giffuni added amdfam10 support (3 months ago)? > > Plus, I've sent other patches earlier this year to -toolchain and made > clear why I was adding them... Had I known that t

Re: GCC withdraw

2013-08-31 Thread John-Mark Gurney
John Baldwin wrote this message on Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:41 -0400: > So I think the crux of the issue might be this: > > I have no doubt that this has been discussed extensively on toolchain@ and in > toolchain-specific devsummit sessions. The proposal to disable GCC by default > does not appea