Re: clang++ 3.3 issue (excessively slow compile vs. gcc 4.6 in just one file of a port)

On 19 Nov 2013, at 11:27, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 19 Nov 2013, at 09:10, Matthias Andree wrote: >> Am 19.11.2013 08:49, schrieb Dimitry Andric: > ... >>> Ok, this looks like http://llvm.org/PR16474 , which has a relatively >>> simple fix. ... >> Excellent, problem solved! >> >> Can we commit

Re: clang++ 3.3 issue (excessively slow compile vs. gcc 4.6 in just one file of a port)

On 19 Nov 2013, at 09:10, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 19.11.2013 08:49, schrieb Dimitry Andric: ... >> Ok, this looks like http://llvm.org/PR16474 , which has a relatively >> simple fix. I have attached it, can you please try it out? You can >> just apply the patch to /usr/src and do: >> >> mak

C++ ABI library incompatibilities c++/stdc++ (was: clang++ 3.3 issue (excessively slow compile vs. gcc 4.6 in just one file of a port))

Am 19.11.2013 08:39, schrieb Konstantin Belousov: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:54:00PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: >> Glib shares the fate, because it defers to std:: containers where possible. >> >> A nice way would require additional work and get the linkers to complain >> that symbols resolve

Re: clang++ 3.3 issue (excessively slow compile vs. gcc 4.6 in just one file of a port)

Am 19.11.2013 08:49, schrieb Dimitry Andric: > On 18 Nov 2013, at 23:54, Matthias Andree wrote: > ... >> Uploaded. http://people.freebsd.org/~mandree/ has: >> >> : the xzipped .ii >> file (unpacked: 6.5 MB) >> >>