I don't have a massive amount expertise in this area but I'll look into it.
>From what I can tell this seems to only affect powerpc64.
Bill
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> On 2016-Sep-20, at 1:59 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> > Has anyone
On 2016-Sep-20, at 1:59 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Has anyone succeeded in bisecting upstream binutils, to see where this
> problem was introduced?
>
> -Dimitry
Apparently not from what I've seen in the lists. It will be a couple/few weeks
before I again have powerpc64 or powerpc access.
Has anyone succeeded in bisecting upstream binutils, to see where this problem
was introduced?
-Dimitry
On 20 Sep 2016, at 22:56, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> The below forward from freebsd-pcc's list confirms that binutils 2.27 not
> working for powerpc64 (& powerpc?)
The below forward from freebsd-pcc's list confirms that binutils 2.27 not
working for powerpc64 (& powerpc?) contexts.
Note: Krzysztof Parzyszek is one of the two people that have recently been
working on updating clang/llvm for fixing some of the issues that block FreeBSD
from using clang for