Re: WITH_CLANG_BOOTSTRAP= for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 but bound to devel/powerpc64-binutils : can such be done?

[Looks like I misread something so. . .] On 2016-Nov-27, at 4:34 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > Currently head has switched to clang 3.9.0 but my > TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64for clang experiments for buildworld are blocked > by WITH_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP= 's ld stopping the buildworld

head -r309179 clang 3.9.0 for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 with devel/powerpc64-binutils used: WITH_LIB32= related assembler source rejected. . .

[Note: ld from WITH_BINTOOLS_BOOTSTRAP= for buildworld fails and stops buildworld. This explains the use of devel/powerpc64-binutils below.] Using clang 3.9.0 for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 with devel/powerpc64-binutils (of an appropriate vintage) apparently requires r1 instead of 1 for a register

[Bug 214863] lang/gcc + libc++ may fail due to spurious __cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length reference

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214863 Jan Beich (mail not working) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

WITH_CLANG_BOOTSTRAP= for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 but bound to devel/powerpc64-binutils : can such be done?

Currently head has switched to clang 3.9.0 but my TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64for clang experiments for buildworld are blocked by WITH_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP= 's ld stopping the buildworld via failing asserts. What I'd like to do is build the bootstrap clang but bound to a devel/powerpc64-binutils vintage

[Bug 214855] head -r309179 TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 clang 3.9.0 based cross build: powerpc.powerpc64/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: BFD 2.17.50 [FreeBSD] 2007-07-03 internal error

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214855 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org

[Bug 214862] head -r309197 clang 3.9.0 vs. TARGET_ARCH=powerpc: fsck_ufs and "df -m" are example failures: __floatdidf gets SIGSEGV's in both of them

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214862 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||regression