https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217753
Jan Beich (mail not working) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214258
Jan Beich (mail not working) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214258
--- Comment #11 from Jan Beich (mail not working) ---
Because if compiler emits undefined references the linker cannot be expected to
know when -lm is required. Looking at
contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214258
--- Comment #10 from Konstantin Belousov ---
(In reply to Jan Beich (mail not working) from comment #9)
Why it should ? The symbols like __divdc3 are referenced by a
compiler-generated code, for instance the __divdc3
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214258
--- Comment #9 from Jan Beich (mail not working) ---
Maybe but cc -E doesn't show any calls to __divdc3 et al.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214258
--- Comment #8 from Konstantin Belousov ---
(In reply to Jan Beich (mail not working) from comment #7)
Which means that libm is really needed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214258
Konstantin Belousov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214258
--- Comment #4 from Jan Beich (mail not working) ---
Comment on attachment 179304
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=179304
ports/devel/openmp/files/patch-link-libm.patch
The workaround isn't
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214258
--- Comment #3 from Jan Beich (mail not working) ---
To avoid maintenance burden it'd be nice if we fix base system regression
before FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE. devel/openmp isn't the only -lomp provider.
$ fetch