On Sat, 2017-09-09 at 15:31 -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> Mark Millard wrote:
> >
> > # ls -lTt /media/boot/kernel/if_igb.ko /mnt/boot/kerndb/if_igb.ko
> > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 25 Sep 8 22:47:36 2017
> > /mnt/boot/kerndb/if_igb.ko -> /mnt/boot/kernel/if_em.ko
> >
On 9/9/17 3:25 PM, Jan Beich wrote:
> Warner Losh writes:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Jan Beich wrote:
>>
>>> Warner Losh writes:
>> The goal, if it doesn't work already, is for NEON to work if used,
>> but not be required, just
Mark Millard wrote:
> # ls -lTt /media/boot/kernel/if_igb.ko /mnt/boot/kerndb/if_igb.ko
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 25 Sep 8 22:47:36 2017 /mnt/boot/kerndb/if_igb.ko
> -> /mnt/boot/kernel/if_em.ko
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 68 Sep 6 20:27:20 2017
>
Apologies for the top post.
Man pages indicate getauxval is a non standard glibc function. Is this an
issue? Is there a more posix way I could compare against? I was previously
wondering to myself if the Linux api is now more standard than the posix api?
Looking forward to all opinions and
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 02:34:10PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> Adding the AT_HWCAP stuff would be relatively easy. I'm not as sure
> what to do about getauxval(). To be maximally linux-compatible (which
> would be good for ports) we'd put getauxval() in libc and make it work
> just like the linux
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-09-09 at 21:25 +0200, Jan Beich wrote:
> > Warner Losh writes:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Jan Beich
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Warner Losh
On Sat, 2017-09-09 at 21:25 +0200, Jan Beich wrote:
> Warner Losh writes:
>
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Jan Beich
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Warner Losh writes:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > This will
Warner,
So you are saying NEON support is a compile time option that has no relevance
to the Application Binary Interface, which is what the FCP-0100 was about?
Thanks for clarification,
Russ
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Virgin Mobile network.
Original Message
From: Warner
[The example here happens to be for amd64 -> aarch64 cross builds.]
The following is from after copying/moving the kernel from where it
was originally, such as (locally) installed on the build machine.
Example of symbolic links from some recent activity under head
-r323246 (producing -r323246
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Jan Beich wrote:
> Warner Losh writes:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Jan Beich wrote:
> >
> >> Warner Losh writes:
> >>
> >> > Greetings,
> >> >
> >> > This will serve as 'Last
Warner Losh writes:
> Greetings,
>
> This will serve as 'Last Call' for any objections to the plan to create an
> armv7 MACHINE_ARCH in FreeBSD, as documented in FCP-0100.
[...]
Some ports want NEON support but FCP-0100 is vague about FreeBSD-specific
differences between armv6
11 matches
Mail list logo