https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241773
--- Comment #9 from bc...@lafn.org ---
Using
(lldb) log enable posix all
then run
(lldb) p id
generates a lot of ptrace entries, however after the p id command, I get:
Process 26878 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'testprog', stop reason =
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241773
--- Comment #8 from bc...@lafn.org ---
Having upgraded to 12.2, I ran the lldb session again. Lldb had degraded
significantly. Stepping through the call to testfunc yields the following:
6
7void testfunc(void);
8int
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241137
Dimitry Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241137
--- Comment #4 from Ed Maste ---
I think this is resolved now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241773
--- Comment #7 from Ed Maste ---
You can turn on logging in lldb to help figure out what is going on - sorry it
has been some time since I've been actively involved in lldb and do not recall
the specific channels and categories.
To see
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241773
--- Comment #6 from Ed Maste ---
Tried to reproduce on -current with
lldb version 11.0.0 (g...@github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git revision
llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2-0-g414f32a9e86)
clang revision llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2-0-g414f32a9e86
llvm revision
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250702
--- Comment #15 from Ed Maste ---
(In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #14)
> That said, it might be more future-proof if we import libcxxabi from
> the llvm project into contrib, and start building that, at least
> for its demangler
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250783
--- Comment #6 from Dimitry Andric ---
Ok, to have something to submit to upstream, we need a reproduction case, and
lld has an option for this, which produces a tarball:
--reproduce= Write a tar file containing input files and
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250388
--- Comment #8 from Alex Richardson ---
I believe that backporting this change is very low risk. However it depends on
a previous commits being merged too. I do not currently have a setup to do this
backporting, but if someone else would
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250702
--- Comment #14 from Dimitry Andric ---
(In reply to Yuri Victorovich from comment #13)
Yes, the elftoolchain demangler misses a few more modern features, and its
development does not seem very active. (Not necessarily for the other parts
10 matches
Mail list logo
