https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #28 from David Chisnall ---
Ah, I see. It would have helped if your reduced test case had used #include
instead of #include .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #27 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to David Chisnall from comment #25)
In 10.2 and below OpenVSP compiles without these modifications. It is in
11-CURRENT where it started to fail when we landed the new
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #26 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
Well, that's FreeBSD 10.2, where the port was already working. The problem only
happens in HEAD after a newer libc++ was imported.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #25 from David Chisnall ---
Works for me:
$ clang++ -c foo.cc
$ clang++ -v
FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.2
Thread model: posix
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #22 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
(In reply to David Chisnall from comment #21)
> This patch looks more complicated than it needs to be. Wouldn't inserting:
>
> using ::array;
>
> Immediately after the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
David Chisnall changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #19 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: rakuco
Date: Thu Feb 25 22:21:38 UTC 2016
New revision: 409563
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/409563
Log:
Add patches to fix the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
Raphael Kubo da Costa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
Raphael Kubo da Costa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #167391|maintainer-approval?(fernan
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #18 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #17)
Yes, please. And thanks to come up with the patch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #16 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com ---
Comment on attachment 167391
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=167391
Enclose array in a namespace
I added two new poudriere logs for {9.3,10.2}amd64. I can
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #167090|0 |1
is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
Raphael Kubo da Costa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #10 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #9)
I think it is not doing the right thing. Have a look at this[1]. std::array is
a feature introduced in C++11 and the software is not
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #9 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
I agree, but this is legacy software (version 3 doesn't even have its own array
implementation anymore as far as I can see) that won't be changed upstream.
My question is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #8 from Dimitry Andric ---
I think the program should not try to use both "using namespace std", and then
use a reserved C++11 name. It should either drop the "using namespace std", or
rename its own array to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
Raphael Kubo da Costa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
17 matches
Mail list logo