[Bug 216316] objcopy (elfcopy) in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216316 Vinícius Zavam changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu

[Bug 216316] objcopy (elfcopy) in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216316 --- Comment #10 from Michael Brown --- (In reply to Ed Maste from comment #8) >From looking at elfcopy/binary.c and its create_binary() function: it appears that elfcopy will use sh_offset to calculate the position within the final binary

[Bug 216316] objcopy (elfcopy) in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216316 --- Comment #9 from Michael Brown --- (In reply to Ed Maste from comment #8) Thanks for taking a look. The multiple sections all with virtual memory addresses of zero are correct: there are genuinely multiple disjoint address spaces at

[Bug 216316] objcopy (elfcopy) in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216316 --- Comment #8 from Ed Maste --- It appears that each section is copied to the output binary at an offset specified by the section's Addr, in an some (unspecified) order - i.e., both .textdata and .zinfo specify an address of 0, and the

[Bug 216316] objcopy (elfcopy) in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216316 Michael Brown changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mc...@ipxe.org --- Comment #7

[Bug 216316] objcopy (elfcopy) in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216316 Gleb Popov changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu

[Bug 216316] objcopy (elfcopy) in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216316 --- Comment #6 from Oleksandr Tymoshenko --- The content of attachment 189987 has been deleted for the following reason: spam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 216316] objcopy (elfcopy) in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216316 Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 216316] objcopy (elfcopy) in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216316 jack changed: What|Removed |Added CC||two...@yahoo.com

[Bug 216316] objcopy (elfcopy) in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216316 --- Comment #5 from jack --- CC:proposed path, testcase, etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org

[Bug 216316] objcopy (elfcopy) in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216316 Mitchell horne changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 216316] objcopy (elfcopy) in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216316 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|objcopy in 11 appears to|objcopy (elfcopy)