Re: 32-bit powerpc kernel builds (head -r356187): old ld (works) vs. devel/binutils@powerpc based (fails to boot): DYNAMIC vs. EXEC_P (powerpc64 lld too)

On 2019-Dec-31, at 16:44, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2019-Dec-31, at 14:52, Mark Millard wrote: > >> My attempt to buildkernel via devel/binutils@powerpc >> produces a kernel that gets a very early crash. >> >> Looking at the normal and alternate kernels a little >> shows. . . >> >> >> >>

Re: 32-bit powerpc kernel builds (head -r356187): old ld (works) vs. devel/binutils@powerpc based (fails to boot): DYNAMIC vs. EXEC_P

On 2019-Dec-31, at 14:52, Mark Millard wrote: > My attempt to buildkernel via devel/binutils@powerpc > produces a kernel that gets a very early crash. > > Looking at the normal and alternate kernels a little > shows. . . > > > > Old ld (and such): > > /boot/kernel/kernel: file format

32-bit powerpc kernel builds (head -r356187): old ld (works) vs. devel/binutils@powerpc based (fails to boot): DYNAMIC vs. EXEC_P

My attempt to buildkernel via devel/binutils@powerpc produces a kernel that gets a very early crash. Looking at the normal and alternate kernels a little shows. . . Old ld (and such): /boot/kernel/kernel: file format elf32-powerpc-freebsd /boot/kernel/kernel architecture: powerpc:common, f