On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 15:21:56 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
> First success.
> I used this map, but also needed to fix a .symver:
>
> #define LIBRADOS_C_API_BASE_DEFAULT(fn) \
> - asm(".symver _" #fn ", " #fn "@@")
> + asm(".symver _" #fn ", " #fn "@")
>
> That last was more
On 2-3-2019 18:35, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 17:49:25 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
On 2-3-2019 16:21, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 14:21:57 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
Now if I look in librados.so for rados_create that gives:
> objdump -t
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 12:50:03 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
> On 2-3-2019 18:35, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 17:49:25 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
> > wrote:
> >> On 2-3-2019 16:21, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 14:21:57 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
> >>> wrote:
On 3-3-2019 14:45, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 3-3-2019 13:34, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 12:50:03 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
On 2-3-2019 18:35, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 17:49:25 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
On 2-3-2019 16:21, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 3-3-2019 13:34, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 12:50:03 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
On 2-3-2019 18:35, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 17:49:25 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
On 2-3-2019 16:21, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 14:21:57 +0100 Willem Jan
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 17:49:25 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
> On 2-3-2019 16:21, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 14:21:57 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
>> wrote:
>>> Now if I look in librados.so for rados_create that gives:
>>>
>>> > objdump -t librados.so.2.0.0 | grep
On 2-3-2019 16:21, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 14:21:57 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
Now if I look in librados.so for rados_create that gives:
> objdump -t librados.so.2.0.0 | grep rados_create
You want to look at dynamic symbols so "objdump -T".
Could it be that the
On 22-2-2019 23:47, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 22-2-2019 22:34, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:09:09 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
Hi Ed ea,
In het ceph project, they started to use library versioning, so it
seems.
But compiling/linking that now with Clang and lld I run
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 14:21:57 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
> Now if I look in librados.so for rados_create that gives:
>
> > objdump -t librados.so.2.0.0 | grep rados_create
You want to look at dynamic symbols so "objdump -T".
___
On 22-2-2019 22:34, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:09:09 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
Hi Ed ea,
In het ceph project, they started to use library versioning, so it seems.
But compiling/linking that now with Clang and lld I run into trouble
building the ceph-tools.
This is
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:09:09 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
> Hi Ed ea,
>
> In het ceph project, they started to use library versioning, so it seems.
>
> But compiling/linking that now with Clang and lld I run into trouble
> building the ceph-tools.
>
> This is what I get back of one of the
On 22-2-2019 21:09, Ed Maste wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 10:09, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
My guess is that your linker doesn't support the new symbol versioning
exports and since the symbols are hidden by default they aren't visible
in the shared library. Previously there was a bug (since
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 10:09, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>
> My guess is that your linker doesn't support the new symbol versioning
> exports and since the symbols are hidden by default they aren't visible
> in the shared library. Previously there was a bug (since Luminous and
> the switch the
Hi Ed ea,
In het ceph project, they started to use library versioning, so it seems.
But compiling/linking that now with Clang and lld I run into trouble
building the ceph-tools.
This is what I get back of one of the Devs:
--
My guess is that your linker doesn't support the new
14 matches
Mail list logo
