Re: status of clang on sparc64?

2014-09-13 Thread Roman Divacky
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 09:51:35AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:04:06PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > What's the current status for running clang on sparc64? > > > > Last time we played with this (februa

Re: status of clang on sparc64?

2014-09-13 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:04:06PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > What's the current status for running clang on sparc64? > > Last time we played with this (february?) it was able to compile > a seemingly working world. So I guess it'

Re: status of clang on sparc64?

2014-09-13 Thread Roman Divacky
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:04:06PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > What's the current status for running clang on sparc64? Last time we played with this (february?) it was able to compile a seemingly working world. So I guess it's not that terribly broken. We didnt test that much stuff though. > In

status of clang on sparc64?

2014-09-11 Thread Steve Kargl
What's the current status for running clang on sparc64? In particular, flame.freebsd.org is running 10.1-PRERELEASE compiled with gcc 4.2.1. Any chance that clanf can be made available on flame? -- Steve ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list h