Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > WITH_META_FILES should give you improvements already in that regard.
>
> Yes, it's a step. We'll need cookies in a lot of places too. I wish
> WITH_META_MODE had been WITH_META_BUILD or WITH_DIRDEPS_BUILD so I could
WITH_DIRDEPS_BUILD would be more
Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 9:22 AM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> > Bryan Drewery wrote:
> >>> WITH_META_FILES should give you improvements already in that regard.
> >>
> >> Yes, it's a step. We'll need cookies in a lot of places too. I wish
>
On 11/13/2015 9:22 AM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> WITH_META_FILES should give you improvements already in that regard.
>>
>> Yes, it's a step. We'll need cookies in a lot of places too. I wish
>> WITH_META_MODE had been WITH_META_BUILD or
On 11/13/2015 1:38 PM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>> On 11/13/2015 9:22 AM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
>>> Bryan Drewery wrote:
> WITH_META_FILES should give you improvements already in that regard.
Yes, it's a step.