Re: Meta mode toolchain bootstrapping [was Re: FreeBSD targets/ out-of-date]

2015-11-13 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Bryan Drewery wrote: > > WITH_META_FILES should give you improvements already in that regard. > > Yes, it's a step. We'll need cookies in a lot of places too. I wish > WITH_META_MODE had been WITH_META_BUILD or WITH_DIRDEPS_BUILD so I could WITH_DIRDEPS_BUILD would be more

Re: Meta mode toolchain bootstrapping [was Re: FreeBSD targets/ out-of-date]

2015-11-13 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 11/13/2015 9:22 AM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > Bryan Drewery wrote: > >>> WITH_META_FILES should give you improvements already in that regard. > >> > >> Yes, it's a step. We'll need cookies in a lot of places too. I wish >

Re: Meta mode toolchain bootstrapping [was Re: FreeBSD targets/ out-of-date]

2015-11-13 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 11/13/2015 9:22 AM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> WITH_META_FILES should give you improvements already in that regard. >> >> Yes, it's a step. We'll need cookies in a lot of places too. I wish >> WITH_META_MODE had been WITH_META_BUILD or

Re: Meta mode toolchain bootstrapping [was Re: FreeBSD targets/ out-of-date]

2015-11-13 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 11/13/2015 1:38 PM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > Bryan Drewery wrote: > >> On 11/13/2015 9:22 AM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: >>> Bryan Drewery wrote: > WITH_META_FILES should give you improvements already in that regard. Yes, it's a step.