On 23 Aug 2013, at 23:37, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
I'd dispute the 'and surely it seems like it does' part of this. Non x86
architectures will continue to use gcc because clang just isn't ready at this
time for them. Some are very close (arm), some are close (powerpc64, mips*),
If the 150 ports that only work with gcc, all work with a ports
gcc and do not need the gcc from base, would the following be OK ?
- 9.x gcc default and clang in base;
- 10.x clang default and gcc in ports;
Well, we write rules and we brake them. ;-)
Just say that we know we brake
On 24 Aug 2013, at 11:30, Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com wrote:
So I vote, let's not give ourselves the burden of lugging dead weight in
base
for another 5 years. (in 2017 do we still want to be worrying about gcc in
base?)
Perhaps more to the point, in 2017 do we want to be responsible
On 24 Aug 2013, at 12:51, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
Oh, I remember. mplayer on i386 can't be builded witch clang -- clang
don't understand inlined asm.
Clang supports inline asm. If there is some specific inline asm syntax that
clang does not recognise, then please will you
In my opinion this just needs to happen, if ports break, we deal with that
on a case by case basis.
Oh, I remember. mplayer on i386 can't be builded witch clang -- clang
don't understand inlined asm.
Well, in this case, you would just have the mplayer maintainer configure the
port to use
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:11:16PM +, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
In my opinion this just needs to happen, if ports break, we deal with that
on a case by case basis.
Oh, I remember. mplayer on i386 can't be builded witch clang -- clang
don't understand inlined asm.
Well, in this
On 8/24/13 7:19 PM, David Chisnall wrote:
On 24 Aug 2013, at 11:30, Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com wrote:
So I vote, let's not give ourselves the burden of lugging dead weight in
base
for another 5 years. (in 2017 do we still want to be worrying about gcc in
base?)
Perhaps more to the
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 01:10:46PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
On 24 Aug 2013, at 12:51, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
Oh, I remember. mplayer on i386 can't be builded witch clang -- clang
don't understand inlined asm.
Clang supports inline asm. If there is some specific
On Aug 24, 2013, at 4:05 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
On 23 Aug 2013, at 23:37, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
I'd dispute the 'and surely it seems like it does' part of this. Non x86
architectures will continue to use gcc because clang just isn't ready at
this time for them. Some are
On Aug 24, 2013, at 6:11 AM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
In my opinion this just needs to happen, if ports break, we deal with that
on a case by case basis.
Oh, I remember. mplayer on i386 can't be builded witch clang -- clang
don't understand inlined asm.
Well, in this case, you would
You know, I could be a total jerk and say:
If you push gcc out to a port, and you have the 'external compiler'
toolchain support working correctly enough to build with this, why don't we
just push clang out to a port, and be done with it?
... just saying.
-adrian
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 01:05:13AM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 06:54:44AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
If firewire code doesn't build on clang correctly, have you filed a bug so
it gets looked at before 10.0 is released? that's pretty broken
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
You know, I could be a total jerk and say:
If you push gcc out to a port, and you have the 'external compiler'
toolchain support working correctly enough to build with this, why don't we
just push clang out to a port,
On 24 Aug 2013, at 23:42, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
And i found PR about clang and mplayer: ports/176272
This PR contains log with build error log.
Please file clang bugs at http://llvm.org/bugs/
David
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:44:38PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
On 24 Aug 2013, at 23:42, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
And i found PR about clang and mplayer: ports/176272
This PR contains log with build error log.
Please file clang bugs at http://llvm.org/bugs/
As if
15 matches
Mail list logo
