Re: binutils 2.27 [not working for powerpc64 (and powerpc?)]

2016-09-20 Thread Bill Sorenson
I don't have a massive amount expertise in this area but I'll look into it. >From what I can tell this seems to only affect powerpc64. Bill On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > > On 2016-Sep-20, at 1:59 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > Has anyone

Re: binutils 2.27 [not working for powerpc64 (and powerpc?)]

2016-09-20 Thread Mark Millard
On 2016-Sep-20, at 1:59 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Has anyone succeeded in bisecting upstream binutils, to see where this > problem was introduced? > > -Dimitry Apparently not from what I've seen in the lists. It will be a couple/few weeks before I again have powerpc64 or powerpc access.

Re: binutils 2.27 [not working for powerpc64 (and powerpc?)]

2016-09-20 Thread Dimitry Andric
Has anyone succeeded in bisecting upstream binutils, to see where this problem was introduced? -Dimitry On 20 Sep 2016, at 22:56, Mark Millard wrote: > > The below forward from freebsd-pcc's list confirms that binutils 2.27 not > working for powerpc64 (& powerpc?)

Re: binutils 2.27 [not working for powerpc64 (and powerpc?)]

2016-09-20 Thread Mark Millard
The below forward from freebsd-pcc's list confirms that binutils 2.27 not working for powerpc64 (& powerpc?) contexts. Note: Krzysztof Parzyszek is one of the two people that have recently been working on updating clang/llvm for fixing some of the issues that block FreeBSD from using clang for