https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230400
Jan Beich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230400
Dimitry Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230400
--- Comment #8 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: dim
Date: Sat Aug 11 20:08:26 UTC 2018
New revision: 337654
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/337654
Log:
Undo r337593 (commenting out of
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230400
--- Comment #7 from Warner Losh ---
As of FreeBSD_version 1200077 we have this function, if that helps anybody...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230400
--- Comment #6 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: dim
Date: Fri Aug 10 21:40:28 UTC 2018
New revision: 337593
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/337593
Log:
Upstream libc++ added a using
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230400
Dimitry Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #5
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230400
--- Comment #4 from Jan Beich ---
What's the plan for /stable/11? MFC timespec_get(), land the workaround or
freeze libc++ (breaking promise in bug 215193) ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230400
--- Comment #2 from Jan Beich ---
Created attachment 195942
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=195942=edit
workaround
Looks like C11 timespec_get() isn't implemented on FreeBSD unlike DragonFly or
NetBSD.
--
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230400
Jan Beich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|devel/cmake,|devel/cmake,
