Vote in favor of keeping ATM (was: NATM still scheduled for removal - please follow up to keep it in-tree)

Hi, I would like to vote in favor of keeping NATM in the kernel. The reason is that I am currently working on writing a device driver for the SpeedTouch USB modem, to replace ports/net/pppoa which is not supported on FreeBSD8+ any more. The SpeedTouch USB in fact terminates as an ATM

Re: Vote in favor of keeping ATM (was: NATM still scheduled for removal - please follow up to keep it in-tree)

On Saturday 19 February 2011 15:14:17 Martin Birgmeier wrote: - what do I need to do on the USB side to start receive and transmit machines (do I need to start separate kernel threads or just issue two usbd_transfer_setup() calls as for loading the firmware), USB already has some kernel

problem with bluetooth dongle

I have something like: Feb 20 02:43:16 limbo kernel: ugen2.3: Broadcom at usbus2 Feb 20 02:43:16 limbo kernel: uhub4: Broadcom BCM2035B0, class 9/0, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 3 on usbus2 Feb 20 02:43:16 limbo kernel: uhub4: 3 ports with 0 removable, bus powered Feb 20 02:43:17 limbo kernel: ugen2.4: