On Sunday 06 January 2013 02:36:38 Eitan Adler wrote:
On 4 January 2013 17:01, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
On Friday 04 January 2013 22:50:38 Eitan Adler wrote:
On 4 January 2013 16:41, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
This typically means set address failed,
On 6 January 2013 03:52, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
Could you do a diff between 9.1 and 9-stable sources and see what is changed?
Might be some BIOS/ACPI stuff too.
I havn't had a chance to go much beyond this but
- 9.1-RELEASE is known to be working (this is r243808, right?)
On Sunday 06 January 2013 19:00:03 Eitan Adler wrote:
On 6 January 2013 03:52, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
Could you do a diff between 9.1 and 9-stable sources and see what is
changed? Might be some BIOS/ACPI stuff too.
I havn't had a chance to go much beyond this but
-
