Re: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb)

2008-01-20 Thread Mikhail T.
понеділок 14 січень 2008, Kirk Davis, Ви написали: =   I have ported the uberry driver from OpenBSD over to FreeBSD.  I have = done a lot of changed and support for the new devices and am just = working on some final changed before submitting it.  I abandoned the = linux uberry driver as I didn't

RE: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb)

2008-01-14 Thread Kirk Davis
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mikhail Teterin I'm trying to port a suit called barry, which provides a library and some = utilities to work with RIM's BlackBerry devices. I have ported the uberry driver from OpenBSD over to

Re: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb)

2008-01-11 Thread Marcin Cieslak
Duane H Hesser wrote: The only work-around is to not have umass, etcetera in your kernel, but that sucks, because one may want to be able to access /some/ devices as mass-storage, and some others as merely generics... A similar problem occurs to many of us who have HP printers which hook

Re: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb)

2008-01-11 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On п'ятниця 11 січень 2008, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: = I think you misunderstand. If there is a mass storage device it will appear = like /dev/da0. If there is a libusb device it will have t = use /dev/usbX.Y.Z. I understand, that you have no intention of /replacing/ daX with /dev/usbX.Y.Z My

Re: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb)

2008-01-11 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On п'ятниця 11 січень 2008, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: = /dev/usbbus_no.dev_no.iface_no.ep_no [...] = What do you think ? I still prefer the elegance of /dev/umassX and /dev/ugenY to the nameless /dev/usbX.Y.Z For example, all SCSI devices have names (da, st, cd, pt, etc.), even though they

Re: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb)

2008-01-11 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 11 January 2008, Mikhail Teterin wrote: On п'ятниця 11 січень 2008, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: = /dev/usbbus_no.dev_no.iface_no.ep_no [...] = What do you think ? I still prefer the elegance of /dev/umassX and /dev/ugenY to the nameless /dev/usbX.Y.Z For example, all SCSI devices

Re: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb)

2008-01-10 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Thursday 10 January 2008, Duane H Hesser wrote: On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:15:16 -0500 Does anyonw (Hans?) know whether the ugen driver can be altered to attach to a single interface, just like any other driver, leaving other interface setups alone? ugen takes the whole device ... It will

BlackBerry (Re: using libusb)

2008-01-09 Thread Mikhail Teterin
= I'm trying to port a suit called barry, which provides a library and some = utilities to work with RIM's BlackBerry devices. = It compiles cleanly, but fails to find a connected device at run time. In = fact, it fails to find _any_ devices, even though ``usbdevs -v'' lists = several including

Re: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb)

2008-01-09 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Mikhail Teterin wrote: = I'm trying to port a suit called barry, which provides a library and some = utilities to work with RIM's BlackBerry devices. = It compiles cleanly, but fails to find a connected device at run time. In = fact, it fails to find _any_

Re: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb)

2008-01-09 Thread Mikhail Teterin
середа 09 січень 2008 01:34 по, Hans Petter Selasky Ви написали: My plan is to extend /dev/usbX so that it becomes a so-called clonable device. When you open up /dev/usb0.2.3 for example, you open up the device having index 2 on USB bus 0 and endpoint 3. This will need some modifications in

Re: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb)

2008-01-09 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Jan 10, 2008 2:34 AM, Hans Petter Selasky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Mikhail Teterin wrote: We really need the low-level (ugen?) interfaces available for all USB-devices -- even those, which are /also/ handled by higher-level interfaces (like ulpt, uscan,