Re: Vote in favor of keeping ATM (was: NATM still scheduled for removal - please follow up to keep it in-tree)

2011-03-09 Thread Harti Brandt
Hi Martin, On Sat, 19 Feb 2011, Martin Birgmeier wrote: MBp.s. A few :-) of the questions I have are MB MB- why the original (as I understand HARP) ATM stack was removed (in the CVS MBlogs the reason cited is the usual giant lock issue of that time), This is one reason. Another problem was,

Re: Vote in favor of keeping ATM (was: NATM still scheduled for removal - please follow up to keep it in-tree)

2011-02-19 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Saturday 19 February 2011 15:14:17 Martin Birgmeier wrote: - what do I need to do on the USB side to start receive and transmit machines (do I need to start separate kernel threads or just issue two usbd_transfer_setup() calls as for loading the firmware), USB already has some kernel