From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:53:31 +0100
Hi Kohji,
A regression issue has been reported when using the CHAIN-BIT patch. Can you
verify this additional patch on you hardware and report back?
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/259462
Thank
On 12/12/13 08:40, Kohji Okuno wrote:
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Hi HPS,
The endpoint type is BULK, and the direction is OUT.
I checked by using a USB analyzer. When I did not set CHAIN bit in
LINK TRB, my host controller sent illegal packets sometimes.
But, ZLPs were sent.
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:37:29 +0100
On 12/12/13 08:40, Kohji Okuno wrote:
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Hi HPS,
The endpoint type is BULK, and the direction is OUT.
I checked by using a USB analyzer. When I did not set CHAIN bit in
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
The following is an excerpt about the CHAIN BIT.
Chain bit
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
The following is an excerpt about the CHAIN BIT.
On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
The following is an
On 12/11/13 13:44, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:50:50 +0100
On 12/11/13 13:44, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
All link trbs which are not the end need CHAIN bit, I think.
But, this is errata in xHCI ver 0.95. So, linux has quirk for chain
bit. Could you check linux codes?
Regards,
Kohji Okuno
Hi Kohji,
I went through the Linux codes a bit, and I see
On 12/12/13 01:59, Kohji Okuno wrote:
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:04:42 +0100
On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
All link trbs which are not the end need CHAIN bit, I think.
But, this is errata in xHCI ver 0.95. So, linux has quirk for
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:15:02 +0100
On 12/12/13 01:59, Kohji Okuno wrote:
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:04:42 +0100
On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
All link trbs which are not the end need
On 12/12/13 08:15, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 12/12/13 01:59, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi Kohji,
Did you check using a USB analyzer what the difference is when setting
the CHAIN bit and not setting the chain bit?
I would guess that if you set the CHAIN-bit in this case, no ZLP will be
sent,
12 matches
Mail list logo
