From: Hans Petter Selasky
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:53:31 +0100
> Hi Kohji,
>
> A regression issue has been reported when using the CHAIN-BIT patch. Can you
> verify this additional patch on you hardware and report back?
>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/259462
>
> Thank you!
>
> --
Hi Kohji,
A regression issue has been reported when using the CHAIN-BIT patch. Can
you verify this additional patch on you hardware and report back?
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/259462
Thank you!
--HPS
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailin
From: Hans Petter Selasky
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:37:29 +0100
> On 12/12/13 08:40, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>> From: Hans Petter Selasky
>>
>> Hi HPS,
>>
>> The endpoint type is BULK, and the direction is OUT.
>>
>> I checked by using a USB analyzer. When I did not set CHAIN bit in
>> LINK TRB, my h
On 12/12/13 08:40, Kohji Okuno wrote:
From: Hans Petter Selasky
Hi HPS,
The endpoint type is BULK, and the direction is OUT.
I checked by using a USB analyzer. When I did not set CHAIN bit in
LINK TRB, my host controller sent illegal packets sometimes.
But, ZLPs were sent.
Hi,
Test OK he
On 12/12/13 08:15, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 12/12/13 01:59, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi Kohji,
Did you check using a USB analyzer what the difference is when setting
the CHAIN bit and not setting the chain bit?
I would guess that if you set the CHAIN-bit in this case, no ZLP will be
sent, becau
From: Hans Petter Selasky
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:15:02 +0100
> On 12/12/13 01:59, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>> From: Hans Petter Selasky
>> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:04:42 +0100
>>> On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
All link trbs which are not the end need CHAIN bit, I
On 12/12/13 01:59, Kohji Okuno wrote:
From: Hans Petter Selasky
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:04:42 +0100
On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
All link trbs which are not the end need CHAIN bit, I think.
But, this is errata in xHCI ver 0.95. So, linux has quirk for chain
bit. Could you
From: Hans Petter Selasky
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:04:42 +0100
> On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>>
>> Hi HPS,
>>
>> All link trbs which are not the end need CHAIN bit, I think.
>> But, this is errata in xHCI ver 0.95. So, linux has quirk for chain
>> bit. Could you check linux codes?
>>
>>
On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
All link trbs which are not the end need CHAIN bit, I think.
But, this is errata in xHCI ver 0.95. So, linux has quirk for chain
bit. Could you check linux codes?
Regards,
Kohji Okuno
Hi Kohji,
I went through the Linux codes a bit, and I see t
From: Hans Petter Selasky
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:50:50 +0100
> On 12/11/13 13:44, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
>
> Could
From: Hans Petter Selasky
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:44:37 +0100
> On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>>> On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB F
On 12/11/13 13:44, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.
On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
The following is an excerpt
> On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
>>
>> Could you refer to
>> ``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
>> in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
>>
>> The following is an excerpt about the CHAI
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
The following is an excerpt about the CHAIN BIT.
Chain bit (
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
The following is an excerpt about the CHAIN BIT.
Chain bit (CH). Set to ‘1’ by software to associate
16 matches
Mail list logo
