Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 09:27:27PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got a HP ScanJet 4300C that seems to be a little bit
> > stubborn.
> >
> ...
> > Is there anything I can do, except for forgetting about
> > this scanner alltogether?
>
> one optio
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Friday 12 December 2008, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > usb2_alloc_device:
>
> You could try to edit the code in "sys/dev/usb2/core/usb2_device.c" and loop
> two times on the set_config command in "usb2_alloc_device()".
>
> Or you can try to make the code ignore
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 09:27:27PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a HP ScanJet 4300C that seems to be a little bit
> stubborn.
>
...
> Is there anything I can do, except for forgetting about
> this scanner alltogether?
one option is to put the device IDs in uscanner.c and see if
On Friday 12 December 2008, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> usb2_alloc_device:
You could try to edit the code in "sys/dev/usb2/core/usb2_device.c" and loop
two times on the set_config command in "usb2_alloc_device()".
Or you can try to make the code ignore the return value from the failing
set_config co
Hi,
I've got a HP ScanJet 4300C that seems to be a little bit
stubborn.
It doesn't work with the old USB code, so I updated to
8-current and compiled a kernel with the new usb2 drivers.
Now I get:
usb2_alloc_device:1590: Failure selecting configuration index 0:
USB_ERR_TIMEOUT, port 2, addr 2
u
