On Thursday 30 July 2009 22:38:12 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Hans Petter, good day.
Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 07:40:27PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
HPS wrote:
Why do you dislike the sysctl approach? It is simple and reliable.
It's duplicating access to data. There is not that much wrong
2009/7/30 Tiernan neovor...@gmail.com:
Hi Rene,
The patch files/patch-bsd.c in the ports tree for devel/libusb contains a
hack that sets the fd to be non blocking to work around USB_SET_TIMEOUT on
ugen, however on my system (6.4-RELEASE) ugen does indeed support
USB_SET_TIMEOUT, and the hack
The following reply was made to PR usb/137189; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net
To: rea-f...@codelabs.ru
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: usb/137189: [usb][patch] create and use sysctl nodes for HID
report descriptors
Date:
On Thursday 30 July 2009 06:11:40 john hood wrote:
john hood
Hi,
Can you verify that the following patch is correct:
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=166865
Thanks!
--HPS
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
