Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, December 08, 2011 a las 09:57:13AM -0600, Dan Nelson
escribió:
Cheap USB thumb drives aren't really optimized for small random-I/O writes.
Can you try mounting the filesystem async? that might help a little. A
workaround would be to use mdconfig
Cheap USB drives, and even many CF drives, aren't much good as random
read-write devices. On my Soekris boxen I run FreeBSD, and mount the
root filesystem rw,noatime. And I don't write to it. ;-) /var is a
memory filesystem, there /var/db/... contain symbolic links to
/usr/local/db/.. because
On Thursday 08 December 2011 07:37:12 Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hello,
I encounter the following problem with UFS file systems on USB keys,
i.e. the problem is not only with one key, but with all I have; the key
in question here is:
Dec 7 22:17:47 tinyCurrent kernel: umass0: Generic Mass
El día Thursday, December 08, 2011 a las 10:10:36AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky
escribió:
# fdisk -I da0
# fdisk -B da0
# bsdlabel -w da0s1 auto
# bsdlabel -B da0s1
# bsdlabel -e da0s1
# newfs /dev/da0s1a
# mount /dev/da0s1a /mnt
When I now bulk write a big file to the file
On Thursday 08 December 2011 10:19:43 Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, December 08, 2011 a las 10:10:36AM +0100, Hans Petter
Selasky escribió:
# fdisk -I da0
# fdisk -B da0
# bsdlabel -w da0s1 auto
# bsdlabel -B da0s1
# bsdlabel -e da0s1
# newfs /dev/da0s1a
# mount
El día Thursday, December 08, 2011 a las 11:47:46AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky
escribió:
I know (as I said) that dd(1) per default writes in blocks of 512 bytes;
but this is not the problem; the problem is the poor performance of
restore(8); the dd(1) was just to see if the USB key
On Thursday 08 December 2011 12:24:18 Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, December 08, 2011 a las 11:47:46AM +0100, Hans Petter
Selasky escribió:
I know (as I said) that dd(1) per default writes in blocks of 512
bytes; but this is not the problem; the problem is the poor
performance
BTW:
Check USB traffic with usbdump utility.
--HPS
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
El día Thursday, December 08, 2011 a las 03:40:06PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky
escribió:
BTW:
Check USB traffic with usbdump utility.
I don't see this 'usbdump', neither in the system nor in ports;
BTW: I've checked the dump, it contains 50.000 dirs and 200.000 files
(because of complete
On Thursday 08 December 2011 15:52:04 Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, December 08, 2011 a las 03:40:06PM +0100, Hans Petter
Selasky escribió:
BTW:
Check USB traffic with usbdump utility.
I don't see this 'usbdump', neither in the system nor in ports;
BTW: I've checked the
On Thursday 08 December 2011 15:58:42 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Thursday 08 December 2011 15:52:04 Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, December 08, 2011 a las 03:40:06PM +0100, Hans Petter
Selasky escribió:
BTW:
Check USB traffic with usbdump utility.
I don't see this
In the last episode (Dec 08), Matthias Apitz said:
I encounter the following problem with UFS file systems on USB keys, i.e.
the problem is not only with one key, but with all I have; the key in
question here is:
Dec 7 22:17:47 tinyCurrent kernel: umass0: Generic Mass Storage, class 0/0,
El día Thursday, December 08, 2011 a las 09:57:13AM -0600, Dan Nelson escribió:
Cheap USB thumb drives aren't really optimized for small random-I/O writes.
Can you try mounting the filesystem async? that might help a little. A
workaround would be to use mdconfig to create a block device
Hello,
I encounter the following problem with UFS file systems on USB keys,
i.e. the problem is not only with one key, but with all I have; the key
in question here is:
Dec 7 22:17:47 tinyCurrent kernel: umass0: Generic Mass Storage, class 0/0,
rev 2.00/1.02, addr 3 on usbus4
Dec 7
14 matches
Mail list logo
