Synopsis: [uplcom] [patch] uplcom.c needs new entry for 4.00 revision of
Prolific chipset
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-usb->imp
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 6 08:24:22 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
imp committed the patch.
http://www.freebsd.
Synopsis: [uplcom] [patch] uplcom.c needs new entry for 4.00 revision of
Prolific chipset
State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
State-Changed-By: imp
State-Changed-When: Sun Jul 1 23:13:12 MDT 2007
State-Changed-Why:
This seems to work well, and was committed a long time ago. I'll MFC
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Monday 12 June 2006 21:39, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> > Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > UPLCOM_INTR_INTERVAL
> > I have such a device and am using it. The question is, what is that
> > option supposed to do?
> It sets how often the USB host controller should query th
On Tuesday 13 June 2006 18:06, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > On Monday 12 June 2006 21:39, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> > > Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > > UPLCOM_INTR_INTERVAL
> > >
> > > I have such a device and am using it. The question is, what is that
> > > option su
On Monday 12 June 2006 21:39, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am currently working on converting "uplcom.c" to my new USB API. In
> > that regard I have a question: Is anyone using "option
> > UPLCOM_INTR_INTE
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently working on converting "uplcom.c" to my new USB API. In that
> regard I have a question: Is anyone using "option UPLCOM_INTR_INTERVAL" or
> "sysctl hw.usb.uplcom.interval", or can this
Hi,
I am currently working on converting "uplcom.c" to my new USB API. In that
regard I have a question: Is anyone using "option UPLCOM_INTR_INTERVAL" or
"sysctl hw.usb.uplcom.interval", or can this be left to the default interrupt
interval?
/*
* The "uplco
The following reply was made to PR usb/92403; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marcin Gryszkalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: usb/92403: uplcom.c needs new entry for 4.00 revision of Prolific
chipset
Date:
The following reply was made to PR usb/92403; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: usb/92403: uplcom.c needs new entry for 4.00 revision of
Prolific chipset
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:
>Number: 92403
>Category: usb
>Synopsis: uplcom.c needs new entry for 4.00 revision of Prolific chipset
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:freebsd-usb
>State: open
>Quarter:
10 matches
Mail list logo