On Friday 04 January 2013 05:45:00 Eitan Adler wrote:
> I have a USB nic which worked in 9.1 but regressed in HEAD and appears
> as an unrecognized device.
>
> I have not had time to properly bisect this issue.
>
> Any suggestions or pointers are appreciated:
>
> ugen2.3:
>
> bLength = 0x0012
On 4 January 2013 03:21, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Did you kldload if_rue?
> Did you enable devd?
Default & Default - it worked in 9.1 so I assumed it should work the
same in HEAD. I'll try explicitly doing so when I get home.
--
Eitan Adler
The following reply was made to PR usb/174963; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: usb/174963: commit references a PR
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 20:44:30 + (UTC)
Author: hselasky
Date: Fri Jan 4 20:44:17 2013
On 4 January 2013 03:21, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>
> Did you kldload if_rue?
Yes. This did nothing to help.
> Did you enable devd?
Yes, this was already enabled.
Use(full|less) debug info:
I now see xhci_do_command: Command timeout!
device init 2 failed USB_ERR_TIMEOUT
which I did not se
Hans Petter Selasky writes:
> On Thursday 03 January 2013 20:58:15 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Hans Petter Selasky writes:
>> > On Thursday 03 January 2013 20:34:50 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> >> On my (updated to Android 4.1.1) phone, MTP only works if the phone's
>> >> USB debugging option is enable
On Friday 04 January 2013 22:31:31 Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 4 January 2013 03:21, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > Did you kldload if_rue?
>
> Yes. This did nothing to help.
>
> > Did you enable devd?
>
> Yes, this was already enabled.
>
> Use(full|less) debug info:
>
> I now see xhci_do_comman
On Friday 04 January 2013 22:33:12 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Hans Petter Selasky writes:
> > On Thursday 03 January 2013 20:58:15 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> >> Hans Petter Selasky writes:
> >> > On Thursday 03 January 2013 20:34:50 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> >> >> On my (updated to Android 4.1.1) phone,
On 4 January 2013 16:41, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> This typically means set address failed, which in the XHCI is done in "HW".
> I'll look into if I find some time. Not sure what we can do about it.
As I mentioned - it works in 9.1 so *something* regressed.
> You can try set first set config
On Friday 04 January 2013 22:50:38 Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 4 January 2013 16:41, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > This typically means set address failed, which in the XHCI is done in
> > "HW". I'll look into if I find some time. Not sure what we can do about
> > it.
>
> As I mentioned - it works i
On Friday 04 January 2013 22:50:38 Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 4 January 2013 16:41, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > This typically means set address failed, which in the XHCI is done in
> > "HW". I'll look into if I find some time. Not sure what we can do about
> > it.
>
Hi,
> As I mentioned - it w
10 matches
Mail list logo