On 2013-06-13, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Can we introduce a new syntax while keeping the old behaviour? > > path zvol/* hide-r > path zvol/* unhide-r > > I think this will be more accepted than changing existing behaviour!
IMHO, the old behavior is so confusing and unintuitive that we should not maintain it. Can you clarify how "hide-r" and "unhide-r" would differ from plain "hide" and "unhide". The current syntax already uses pattern matching via fnmatch(9). > Is this stack element really needed? > > + char specname[SPECNAMELEN + 1]; Need to check if M_WAITOK malloc is possible here. -- Jaakko _______________________________________________ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
