Re: usb/122539: kernel panic: ohci_abort_xfer: not in process context

2009-03-12 Thread John Hein
The following reply was made to PR usb/122539; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Hein jh...@timing.com To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, artur.zabron...@gmail.com Cc: u...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb/122539: kernel panic: ohci_abort_xfer: not in process context Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:44:21

Re: usb/122539: kernel panic: ohci_abort_xfer: not in process context

2009-03-12 Thread John Hein
The following reply was made to PR usb/122539; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Hein jh...@timing.com To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: usb/122539: kernel panic: ohci_abort_xfer: not in process context Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:14:42 -0600 The code to pull the patch out

Re: usb/122539: kernel panic: ohci_abort_xfer: not in process context

2009-03-12 Thread John Hein
Note: this is not specific to ohci or the device originally used in this PR. The problem is more generic. This happens for us when hardware flow control is turned on when using a usb serial device (specifically an ftdi based one). Eventually if hardware flow has to kick in and RTS is to be set,

access usb device from bhyve vm

2018-08-21 Thread John Hein
Does anyone have thought about what it would take to support access to individual usb devices "natively" from a bhyve vm? ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: access usb device from bhyve vm

2018-08-22 Thread John Hein
blubee blubeeme wrote at 08:42 +0800 on Aug 22, 2018: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 8:26 AM John Hein wrote: > > Does anyone have thought about what it would take to support access to > individual usb devices "natively