to
port this from USB1 to USB2.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Linux
Binary Compatibility are different. I'm not sure we can do it like what
the linuxulator is doing.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 06:36:56PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
Just for information. The code for supporting NDIS USB drivers has been
committed into HEAD. Please tell me if you encounter problems.
Tried to compile kernel, but gives error. Is it related
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:38:18PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
Hi Weongyo,
I would like to commit urtw(4) driver for supporting Realtek's 8187L
wireless chipset based on USB into HEAD by the end of the week if there
are no objections. And the license of files
).
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:37:57AM +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
As you know, I've been gradually working to eliminate all non-MPSAFE
network device driver infrastructure for 8.0, having removed non-MPSAFE
network protocol infrastructure in 7.0
writing some data into msg and data pipe there was no
any response using read(2). The problem source can be found at:.
http://perforce.freebsd.org/depotTreeBrowser.cgi?FSPC=//depot/user/weongyo/wireless/src/usr.sbin/uathloadHIDEDEL=NO
Are there something I missed in here?
regards,
Weongyo
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:52:47AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
During porting uath(4) to usb2 I found the following code failed to run:
data = open(/dev/usb/0.2.2, O_WRONLY, 0);
timeout = UATH_DATA_TIMEOUT
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:54:17PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:52:47AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
During porting uath(4
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:01:23AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Thursday 19 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
ugen_default_read_callback:384: actlen=0, aframes=0
ugen_default_read_callback:384: actlen=0, aframes=0
ugen_read_clear_stall_callback:477: f=0xc4d5b000: stall cleared
One
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:32:23PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 19 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:01:23AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Thursday 19 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
ugen_default_read_callback:384: actlen=0
);
...
uath_free_rx_data_list(sc);
uath_free_tx_data_list(sc);
uath_free_cmd_list(sc, sc-sc_cmd, UATH_CMD_LIST_COUNT);
After adding it I couldn't see `Memory modified after free' messages
anymore. My question is that I can't understand why adding
usb2_pause_mtx() helps this symptom?
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:46:54AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Wednesday 25 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello Hans :),
I think porting uath(4) to usb almost have done that it works well to
associate with AP and for WPA but I'm suffered from a strange panic after
detach
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:46:54AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Wednesday 25 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello Hans :),
I think porting uath(4) to usb almost have done that it works well to
associate with AP and for WPA but I'm suffered from a strange panic after
detach
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:02:02AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Thursday 26 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:46:54AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
To solve this problem I modified codes slightly like below:
usb2_transfer_unsetup(sc-sc_xfer
Hello Hans,
I have a simple question that is there a possibility for .mh.callback of
usb2_config to be called after usb2_transfer_unsetup()?
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
traffic.
It's merged into HEAD not too lately. :-)
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:16:00AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:49:59 -0700 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:56:12PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Weongyo is working on a usbdump utility to monitor ongoing USB traffic.
It's merged into HEAD
process context it operates USB commands that most of
times it'd be blocked at least 125 us (it'd be always true for USB)
In a view of driver developer it'd be more convenient if USB stack has a
feature like this (timer supporting blocking).
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: usb_sleepout.c
for each
ethernet devices are linux-style `ue[0-9]+'. The naming rule would
be kept at STABLE_8 but not sure at STABLE_9.
If no objections I'd like to see this patch at HEAD.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: usb_ethernet.c
Hello,
As one of patch series it's for patching axe(4) without dependency of
uether module. The change log would be almost same like the previous
patch log.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: if_axereg.h
===
--- if_axereg.h (revision
and parentheses.
Please reviews.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: if_cdce.c
===
--- if_cdce.c (revision 214604)
+++ if_cdce.c (working copy)
@@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ __FBSDID($FreeBSD$);
#include sys/lock.h
#include sys/mutex.h
#include sys
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Sunday 31 October 2010 01:19:01 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello USB guys,
The following patch is to add a implementation, called `sleepout'.
Please reviews. I'd like to commit it into HEAD if no objections.
Adds
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:30:25AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Sunday 31 October 2010 23:43:04 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
+static void
+axe_watchdog(void *arg)
+{
+ struct axe_softc *sc = arg;
+ struct ifnet *ifp = sc-sc_ifp;
+
+ if ((ifp-if_drv_flags
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:10:43AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Monday 01 November 2010 03:03:48 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Sunday 31 October 2010 01:19:01 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello USB guys,
1) All
which enqueued at last should
be executed at last. It seems that at least it's not a general for
taskqueue(9). In my humble opinion it looks a trick. I think it'd
better to find a general solution to solve it though I used sx(9) lock
in my patches.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
and
multiple patches are mixed into one. Please separate into smallest
pieces then send freebsd-usb@ again. I don't want to do a jumbo jump.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
that what BPF should cover.
I agreed with that BPF is for ethernet packet filtering but could
not make sure myself that BPF could cover USB packets.
Please tell me your opinion if you guys have better approach.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-usb
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:36:47PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:52:36PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 06:31 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
[CC sanitized]
On Tuesday 23 November 2010
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On 24 November 2010 13:36, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
- BPF was normally for ethernet frames (most operations were
based on mbuf including the machine
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On 24 November 2010 13:36, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
- BPF was normally for ethernet frames (most operations were
based on mbuf including the machine
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 07:35:30PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On 24 November 2010 18:46, Weongyo Jeong weongyo.je...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On 24 November 2010 13:36, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tuesday 23 November
32 matches
Mail list logo
