On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 07:35:30PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 24 November 2010 18:46, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> >> On 24 November 2010 13:36, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wro
On Wednesday 24 November 2010 08:48:58 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> I think that to be really useful the BPF code needs some additional
> information through additional misc. instructions to orientate about the
> data it is getting from USB. For example the frame number, state for
> control trans
On Wednesday 24 November 2010 07:35:30 Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 24 November 2010 18:46, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> >> On 24 November 2010 13:36, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Wednesday 24 November 2010 01:18:32 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:52:36PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 06:31 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > > [CC sanitized]
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 06:01 pm, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > > Dear Weo
On 24 November 2010 18:46, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>> On 24 November 2010 13:36, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
>> >> - BPF was normally for ethernet frames (most operations were
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 24 November 2010 13:36, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> >> - BPF was normally for ethernet frames (most operations were
> >> based on mbuf including the machine filter and t
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 24 November 2010 13:36, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> >> - BPF was normally for ethernet frames (most operations were
> >> based on mbuf including the machine filter and t
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:36:47PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:52:36PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 06:31 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > > > [CC sanitized]
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday
On 24 November 2010 13:36, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
>> - BPF was normally for ethernet frames (most operations were
>> based on mbuf including the machine filter and there were a lot of
>> assumptions the input buffer is mbuf type. For exa
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:52:36PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 06:31 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > > [CC sanitized]
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 06:01 pm, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > > Dear Weong
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:52:36PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 November 2010 06:31 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > [CC sanitized]
> >
> > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 06:01 pm, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > Dear Weongyo,
> > >
> > > > NACK. You already could recognize that the patch is
On 24 November 2010 11:19, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find attached official usbdump patch from HPS trying to re-use as much
> as possible of Weongyo's code which was committed not long ago. You need to
> SVN up to the latest 9-current.
> @@ -270,7 +122,7 @@
> * The kernel needs
Dear Weongyo,
> NACK. You already could recognize that the patch is quite big and
> multiple patches are mixed into one. Please separate into smallest
> pieces then send freebsd-usb@ again. I don't want to do a jumbo jump.
Probably it is easier if you look at the code after you've applied it
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:19:33PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find attached official usbdump patch from HPS trying to re-use as much
> as possible of Weongyo's code which was committed not long ago. You need to
> SVN up to the latest 9-current.
>
> This patch should fix
NOTE:
Please revert the following patch before applying my patch, else there is a
conflict.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/215764
--HPS
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscrib
15 matches
Mail list logo