Re: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD

2013-01-06 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Sunday 06 January 2013 02:36:38 Eitan Adler wrote: On 4 January 2013 17:01, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: On Friday 04 January 2013 22:50:38 Eitan Adler wrote: On 4 January 2013 16:41, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: This typically means set address failed,

Re: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD

2013-01-06 Thread Eitan Adler
On 6 January 2013 03:52, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: Could you do a diff between 9.1 and 9-stable sources and see what is changed? Might be some BIOS/ACPI stuff too. I havn't had a chance to go much beyond this but - 9.1-RELEASE is known to be working (this is r243808, right?)

Re: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD

2013-01-06 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Sunday 06 January 2013 19:00:03 Eitan Adler wrote: On 6 January 2013 03:52, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: Could you do a diff between 9.1 and 9-stable sources and see what is changed? Might be some BIOS/ACPI stuff too. I havn't had a chance to go much beyond this but -

Re: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD

2013-01-05 Thread Eitan Adler
On 4 January 2013 17:01, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: On Friday 04 January 2013 22:50:38 Eitan Adler wrote: On 4 January 2013 16:41, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: This typically means set address failed, which in the XHCI is done in HW. I'll look into if I find

Re: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD

2013-01-04 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 04 January 2013 05:45:00 Eitan Adler wrote: I have a USB nic which worked in 9.1 but regressed in HEAD and appears as an unrecognized device. I have not had time to properly bisect this issue. Any suggestions or pointers are appreciated: ugen2.3: USB 10100 LAN USBKR100

Re: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD

2013-01-04 Thread Eitan Adler
On 4 January 2013 03:21, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: Did you kldload if_rue? Did you enable devd? Default Default - it worked in 9.1 so I assumed it should work the same in HEAD. I'll try explicitly doing so when I get home. -- Eitan Adler

Re: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD

2013-01-04 Thread Eitan Adler
On 4 January 2013 03:21, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: Did you kldload if_rue? Yes. This did nothing to help. Did you enable devd? Yes, this was already enabled. Use(full|less) debug info: I now see xhci_do_command: Command timeout! device init 2 failed USB_ERR_TIMEOUT

Re: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD

2013-01-04 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 04 January 2013 22:31:31 Eitan Adler wrote: On 4 January 2013 03:21, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: Did you kldload if_rue? Yes. This did nothing to help. Did you enable devd? Yes, this was already enabled. Use(full|less) debug info: I now see

Re: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD

2013-01-04 Thread Eitan Adler
On 4 January 2013 16:41, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: This typically means set address failed, which in the XHCI is done in HW. I'll look into if I find some time. Not sure what we can do about it. As I mentioned - it works in 9.1 so *something* regressed. You can try set

Re: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD

2013-01-04 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 04 January 2013 22:50:38 Eitan Adler wrote: On 4 January 2013 16:41, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: This typically means set address failed, which in the XHCI is done in HW. I'll look into if I find some time. Not sure what we can do about it. As I mentioned - it

Re: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD

2013-01-04 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 04 January 2013 22:50:38 Eitan Adler wrote: On 4 January 2013 16:41, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: This typically means set address failed, which in the XHCI is done in HW. I'll look into if I find some time. Not sure what we can do about it. Hi, As I mentioned