On Sat, 06 Feb 2021 05:14:52 +0900,
Yuri Pankov wrote:
>
> KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote:
> > Hi, all
> >
> > Yesterday, I've updated 14.0-CURRENT and tried to start VM,
> > filed to start with "loader returned error 139". VM log is
> > as follows
Hi, all
Yesterday, I've updated 14.0-CURRENT and tried to start VM,
filed to start with "loader returned error 139". VM log is
as follows :
root@vm:~ # tail -20 /vm/msrvkxb/vm-bhyve.log
Feb 05 09:50:18: initialising
Feb 05 09:50:18: [loader: bhyveload]
Feb 05 09:50:18: [cpu: 2]
Feb 05
Hi, all
I'm tring to build packages in arm64/aarch64 on
qemu-system-aarch64. But it's too late in comparision to
amd64 on bhyve. For example, `make package-recursive' of
devel/binutils on qemu takes 67 times of bhyve [1]. I found
that it's difference caused from disk geometry factors such
as
(2.7G)
root@lpbkpkx:~ #
Does it caused by disk cache ?
On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:23:12 +0900,
KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote:
>
> Hi, all
>
> I'm working on qemu-system-aarch64 and try to build
> packages, but it's too late to compile stuffs. I've compare
> to bhyve package building
Hi, all
I'm working on qemu-system-aarch64 and try to build
packages, but it's too late to compile stuffs. I've compare
to bhyve package building procedure, then about 70 times
later than bhyve one. I don't know why so much late on
qemu-system-aarch64.
Following results are devel/binutils
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:23:20 +0900,
KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote:
>
> Hi, all
>
> I'm wondering why system_powerdown can not be worked but
> system_reset can work on qemu-system-aarch64. I set up
> FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT-arm64-aarch66 as follows:
>
> root@vm:~ # uname -a
>
Hi, all
I'm wondering why system_powerdown can not be worked but
system_reset can work on qemu-system-aarch64. I set up
FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT-arm64-aarch66 as follows:
root@vm:~ # uname -a
FreeBSD vm.truefc.org 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #0 r353025: Thu Oct 3
19:38:47 JST 2019
Hi, Julian
On Wed, 08 Jan 2020 10:56:04 +0900,
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> I have been out of it for a while but I see that in Linux, KVM is used
> as an emulation engine in QEMU.
>
> Do we have any plans to do the same with Bhyve?
I really want to use defferent archtecture in bhyve. In
order
groups: tap qemu-port
media: Ethernet autoselect
status: no carrier
nd6 options=21
root@vm:/vm/test #
What's wrong ?
Best regards.
---
Kiriyama Kazuhiko
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.or
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:17:04 +0900,
KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 19:35:23 +0900,
> KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:07:05 +0900,
> > Simon wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi )
> >
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 19:35:23 +0900,
KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:07:05 +0900,
> Simon wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi )
> > May be the same problem.
> > I said about this here
> > https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/fre
media: Ethernet autoselect
status: active
nd6 options=29
Opened by PID 85496
root@vm:~ #
Whats' wrong ? BTW 12.1-PRERELEASE(r352368) and
12.0-RELEASE-p10(r352368) are nothing happened.
[1] https://github.com/TrueFC/ports/tree/master/sysutils/vm-bhyve-devel
---
KIRIYAM
_
> freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
---
KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko
13 matches
Mail list logo
