[Differential] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes

kristof abandoned this revision. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1944 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: kristof, trociny, gnn, zec, rodrigc, glebius, eri, bz, nvass-gmx.com Cc: ryan_timewasted.me, mmoll, javier_ovi_yahoo.com,

[Differential] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes

kristof commandeered this revision. kristof edited reviewers, added: nvass-gmx.com; removed: kristof. kristof added a comment. I'm commandeering this so it can be closed, because the patch fro bz@ (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6924) has been included. REVISION DETAIL

[Differential] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes

bz added a comment. Can I have you guys have a look at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6924 Thanks REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1944 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: nvass-gmx.com, trociny, kristof, gnn, zec, rodrigc,

[Differential] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes

___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[Differential] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes

nvass-gmx.com added a comment. Thanks for taking a look Kristof, I believe all your points are valid. Thing is that all eventhandlers need a more thorough look. They don't work as they should; be it virtualized or not, be it a VIMAGE or GENERIC kernel. I am trying to take a look but I

[Differential] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes

kristof added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS sys/netpfil/pf/pf_if.c:130 I don't understand why this is required. Surely if an ifnet lives in V_ifnet (so, lives in the current vnet) ifp->if_vnet is always going to be curvnet? sys/netpfil/pf/pf_if.c:141 Why add curvnet here?