RE: Trying Hyper-V support from the svn project source - panic booting kernel?

Hi Karl, This turned out to be an old issue which is already fixed in the current branch. Please update your code to the current branch and you should not see this issue. Alternatively you can disable witnesses (using set debug.witness.watch=-1) and move past the boot stage. Please let us

RE: Trying Hyper-V support from the svn project source - panic booting kernel?

--On 11 September 2013 06:50 + Abhishek Gupta (LIS) abgu...@microsoft.com wrote: Hi Karl, This turned out to be an old issue which is already fixed in the current branch. Please update your code to the current branch and you should not see this issue. Alternatively you can disable

Re: Hyper-V driver development status

--On 11 September 2013 16:43 +0400 Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com wrote: I've just checked out and built projects/hyperv and everything looks good. I just did that as well this morning... FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #6 r255470: Wed Sep 11 10:29:25 UTC 2013

RE: Hyper-V driver development status

Hi guys, Thanks for the feedback. I have seen the caclru: runtime went backwards from xxx usec to yyy usec for pid off an on but I have not seen any visible system impact because of that. It could be because the clock is virtualized and the system is taking some time to adjust to it. We

Re: bhyve and AMD

Hi, The bhyve site says, AMD SVN support arrived on August 22nd, 2013 with FreeBSD svn r254677 and requires testing. How can we tell which AMD processors are supported? Would that be the same AMD processors that are listed on the following page as having Rapid Virtualization Indexing Required

Re: bhyve and AMD

On Wed, September 11, 2013 4:11 pm, Peter Grehan wrote: [...] Yes, that would be it. The RVI support has been there in CPUs for quite a long time now - it would be hard to find a recent AMD CPU that doesn't have it. [DN:] Or is bhyve using a different feature of some AMD processors? [PG:]

Re: bhyve and AMD

(Anish - is nRIP required ?) Yes, nRIP is required and it will be hard to find AMD processor with SVM support that doesn't have it. We used Phenom II for bhyve port on AMD which is 2+ years old and has RVI and nRIP support. I use http://instlatx64.atw.hu/ to check SVM CPUID capability and looks

Re: bhyve and AMD

Hi, No, that's the main one. [DN:] When you say that that's the main one, do you mean that there are also other features that an AMD processor must have, besides RVI, to be compatible with bhyve, but that might be absent in some AMD processors with RVI? If so, what other features should I

test message

I seem to not be getting -virtualization@ mail let's see if this works ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: bhyve and AMD

On Wed, September 11, 2013 5:20 pm, Anish wrote: Yes, nRIP is required and it will be hard to find AMD processor with SVM support that doesn't have it. We used Phenom II for bhyve port on AMD which is 2+ years old and has RVI and nRIP support. I'm sorry to have to ask this, but what is nRIP?