Hi Aryeh,
Does this bring up the same power failure scenario issues mentioned in
the link you provided?It seems like the only way to get reasonable
performance is to be essentially unsafe in guest writes to the host
disk?
Use ZFS and a ZIL to mitigate this. Or UFS with journalling.
A qu
Disclaimer: This is more of a thinking out loud then it is an definative
set of suggestions on the matter. Also a cleaned up version of this will
likely become PetiteCloud's white paper on storage and disaster recovery.
I do not make any promises to when any of it might be implemented and/or if
i
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Peter Grehan wrote:
> > I have 1 host that dual boots FreeBSD and Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS and bhtyve
>
>> seems to be atleast 3 or 4 times faster with disk I/O then kvm using the
>> most stripped down command lines I can come up with.
>>
>
> I'm guessing that the defa
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Peter Grehan wrote:
> > I have 1 host that dual boots FreeBSD and Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS and bhtyve
>
>> seems to be atleast 3 or 4 times faster with disk I/O then kvm using the
>> most stripped down command lines I can come up with.
>>
>
> I'm guessing that the defa
> I have 1 host that dual boots FreeBSD and Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS and bhtyve
seems to be atleast 3 or 4 times faster with disk I/O then kvm using the
most stripped down command lines I can come up with.
I'm guessing that the default cache mode for qemu in that release is
"none". You may want to
I have 1 host that dual boots FreeBSD and Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS and bhtyve
seems to be atleast 3 or 4 times faster with disk I/O then kvm using the
most stripped down command lines I can come up with.
--
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org
__
Under kvm (ubuntu 12.04.03 LTS) when logged in via VNC and installing
10-RELEASE the installer just boots you during the disk initialization
phase. Who should this be reported to?
--
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org
___
fr
Just an example of this then I will be quiet and take my frustration out on
inanimate objects which what kind of hair brained unix like OS would not
come with a working C compiler (ubuntu does not come with one)
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> I forgot how frustrating Lin
I forgot how frustrating Linux can be (FB really spoils you) until just
today when I started to really play with it for petitecloud development
reasons instead of making "cute toys" like the how to install DevStack
tutorial
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Frédéric Alix wrote:
> Yes, i saw this t
Yes, i saw this two days ago. I read it and take many notes.
2014-02-01 Aryeh Friedman :
> Just a small tip if your new to FreeBSD you might surprised that 90% of
> the real action happens in mailling lists not web based things. Namely
> -virtualization@ is likely your best long term resource
Just a small tip if your new to FreeBSD you might surprised that 90% of the
real action happens in mailling lists not web based things. Namely
-virtualization@ is likely your best long term resource as you learn.
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Frédéric Alix wrote:
> | I am also looking into t
Oh super !
Thx !!! \o/
2014-02-01 Julian Elischer :
> On 2/1/14, 6:44 PM, Frédéric Alix wrote:
>
>> | I am also looking into this but I think you will find the FB has almost
>> everything you need right out of the box
>>
>> yes, you should right. I am reading the FB handbook and many blogs for
On 2/1/14, 6:44 PM, Frédéric Alix wrote:
| I am also looking into this but I think you will find the FB has almost
everything you need right out of the box
yes, you should right. I am reading the FB handbook and many blogs for
learn how run *BSD
After 13 years in Solaris world, it's a big change
I very like bhyve and the new iSCSI seem to be great too.
>
The fact that bhyve does not attempt to manage the iSCSI directly is a real
win here IMO for example see
http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/content/ch_introduction-to-openstack-compute.html#section_nova-disaster-recovery-processf
| I am also looking into this but I think you will find the FB has almost
everything you need right out of the box
yes, you should right. I am reading the FB handbook and many blogs for
learn how run *BSD
After 13 years in Solaris world, it's a big change to me.
I very like bhyve and the new iSCSI
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Frédéric Alix wrote:
> Few minutes ago i read this:
>
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2013-10-2013-12.html#FreeBSD-Host-Support-for-OpenStack-and-OpenContrail
>
> Hum... OpenContrail port .. :p
> I am not interesting by OpenStack but OpenContrail, of c
Few minutes ago i read this:
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2013-10-2013-12.html#FreeBSD-Host-Support-for-OpenStack-and-OpenContrail
Hum... OpenContrail port .. :p
I am not interesting by OpenStack but OpenContrail, of course !
After a little search, i found this:
http://opencontr
Hello Frederic,
This is an interesting question. Funny thing is in the past day I had the same
doubt, but after some minutes I realized FreeBSD already has everything that is
needed to handle a "virtualization network" by itself. Obviously what's missing
is some kind of GUI or guided path to do
Hi !
I am learning how use bhyve and actullay, it's a real pleasure to use it :-)
I would like build a virtual infra in a box. Many bhyve vm for each
services. Firewalls, routers, dns, app serv, databases serv, ...
For this, bhyve is just perfect.
Now, i need a tool for build a virtual network, li
19 matches
Mail list logo
