Hi,
VirtIO SCSI is a virtualized HBA that offers a couple of advantages
over the existing VirtIO block disk devices. Instead of having a vtbdX
disk, familiar daX and cdX devices are created like from other SCSI
drivers. A single HBA is able to support multiple devices unlike the
VirtIO block where
Hi,
- Original Message -
> From: "Bryan Venteicher"
> To: freebsd-s...@freebsd.org
> Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
> Sent: Friday, June 8, 2012 1:29:18 AM
> Subject: [CFT] VirtIO SCSI Driver
>
> Hi,
>
> VirtIO SCSI is a virtualized HBA that
Hi,
- Original Message -
> From: "Sean Bruno"
> To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 4:49:42 PM
> Subject: dev/virtio stuff
>
> So ... I see we have virtio nowish. I've started my hackery to make
> some man(4) pages for this, but have some questions.
Hi,
- Original Message -
> From: t...@tms3.com
> To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 11:19:21 AM
> Subject: Virtio NIC
>
> Hey list,
>
> Running a 9.1rc-2 VM on Smartos using virtio drivers and the network
> performance seems to cap at 10MiB for ftp
Hi,
- Original Message -
> From: "Sean Bruno"
> To: "Bryan Venteicher"
> Cc: sbr...@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 12:33:11 PM
> Subject: Re: dev/virtio stuff
>
> See below.
>
> On M
Hi,
- Original Message -
> From: "Sean Bruno"
> To: "Bryan Venteicher"
> Cc: sbr...@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 2:22:03 PM
> Subject: Re: dev/virtio stuff
>
>
> > > > There ar
Hi,
- Original Message -
> From: "Marat Bakeev"
> To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 6:30:51 AM
> Subject: vtnet cannot allocate interrupts
>
> Hello.
>
> After updating from http://svn.freebsd.org/base/projects/bhyve to
> http://svn.freebsd.org/bas
Hi,
- Original Message -
> Hello,
>
> I filed a bug:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=178955
>
I committed a fix to this in the multiqueue driver [1] during BSDCan,
haven't merged it back into HEAD yet. I'll do that in a couple of days.
Unless you have multiple MAC unicast
- Original Message -
> Thx! Do you plan to merge the multiqueue branch?
>
Hopefully within 1-2 months.
> Julian
>
>
> ___
> freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
>
- Original Message -
> It is connected to the physical nic via a switch (no intermediate
> routers). DHCP doesn't even attempt because there is no carrier on
> tap0:
>
> em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
>
> options=4219b
> ether 30:85:a9:ec:24:95
> inet 10.0.10.10 n
- Original Message -
> Now that I switched from virtio to 82545EM all my networking problems
> disappeared.
>
> Appart from pf, I had also some other small networking problems that I
> thought were apache/php related, but were in fact due to virtio.
>
> virtio is clearly the culprit, bu
- Original Message -
> What happens if you "camcontrol rescan all" ?
>
A VirtIO block device (and a parent VirtIO PCI device) is what is likely
getting created here, so there is no SCSI bus to rescan.
I had a prior private conversation with Robert last week. This particular
use case w
- Original Message -
> I have created an image of 10-RC5 that I will try the same conditions
> I described earlier on. Unfortunately, I'm using a cloud service, so I
> don't have control to change the settings of OpenStack.
>
And just to be clear: In 10.0, you can only resize a disk tha
- Original Message -
> Hi Olivier,
> > just a report of my migration to bhyve.
>
> Yeah !!!
>
> > First remark comparing the disk format: With an original nanobsd disk image
> > of 488MB.
> > - Virtualbox format disk size: 133M
> > - bhyve raw disk size: 488M
>
> If you create a sp
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:17 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> I am happy to see that virtio_random(4) will be included in FreeBSD 10.1.
> To try it out, I loaded up BETA1 in a virtual machine with entropy
> passthrough enabled. After booting it with the virtio_random module loaded
> I see th
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:38 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
> On Oct 15, 2014, at 5:56 AM, freebsd-li...@potato.growveg.org wrote:
>
> > Can a bhyve instance be resized? I'm talking about the disk.
> > Say your end user needs more diskspace. They have 32GB. They need 64GB.
> > How do you do it? I presum
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Shawn Webb wrote:
> I was running Poudriere in bhyve. I got this kernel panic. I'm on a new
> 11-CURRENT as of this morning. Would this be a NULL pointer deref?
>
> `uname -a`: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #1
> b5310d8(hardened/current/master)-dirty:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> Using the TSC as the default timecounter in a VM is dangerous. On some
> hardware, the TSC is not synchronized across all CPU cores. This means
> that if a VM migrates from one core to another, it could see the
> timecounter value go backward
18 matches
Mail list logo
