On Friday 20 February 2009 00:26:21 Julian Elischer wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
I've been doing performance testing on the 'non-vimage'
'structified' case VS the original 'globals' case and have not been
able to see any really significant differences (though I have seen
very slight
On Sunday 10 May 2009 16:41:52 Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
Hi
I've installed a fresh copy of this months snapshot, updated src via
cvsup, made a copy of the GENERIC config file, added 'options VIMAGE'
'nooptions SCTP' compiled installed it, on boot the system panics
with the error:
panic: in
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 06:57:53 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Hi,
first of all freebsd-virtualization@ is the better list for this; Cc:ed.
We are using FreeBSD + VIMAGE at work, and we have seen an annoying
problem : there seems to be a memory
On Thursday 13 January 2011 13:42:30 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hi,
Please, review the attached patch. It is against yesterday's HEAD
and it virtualizes if_bridge.
You can use the bridgetest script to create quickly a topology
with redundant links to test STP.
Looks good to me, though I'm
On Monday 09 May 2011 19:05:28 Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2011 16:21:15 +0200 Marko Zec wrote:
MZ On Monday 09 May 2011 14:48:25 Mikolaj Golub wrote:
Hi,
Trying ipfw_nat under VIMAGE kernel I got this panic on the module
load:
MZ Hi,
MZ I think the problem here
this helps,
Marko
Adrian
On 6 March 2012 07:33, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote:
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 10:53:18 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote:
On Monday 05 March 2012 22:14:45 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
Hi,
I am a very
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 22:30:26 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote:
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 21:29:32 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote:
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 21:13:00 Monthadar Al
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 22:49:56 Adrian Chadd wrote:
Wait a sec. Is it possible that the macro is a no-op when we're
building modules w/ VNET?
Yes that's it, the VNET stuff resolves (mostly) to whitespace when options
VIMAGE is not on!
Marko
___
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 22:52:43 Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 6 March 2012 13:51, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote:
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 22:49:56 Adrian Chadd wrote:
Wait a sec. Is it possible that the macro is a no-op when we're
building modules w/ VNET?
Yes that's it, the VNET stuff
On Monday 22 July 2013 08:57:43 Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
hm. There's lots of mbuf free calls in the net80211 TX and RX path; do
we have to have to set the vnet context during the whole tx/rx path?
I'm not sure about
/00140
5.html
I reported multiple PF-related panics when VIMAGE was enabled
in my kernel config.
In these posts:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2013-July/00141
3.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2013-July/00142
0.html
Marko Zec seemed
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:37:37 +0200
Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:27:28PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Kris Moore k...@pcbsd.org wrote:
It was for a while in 9.2, but we removed it from 10.0 and later
due
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:07:46 +0400
Alexander V. Chernikov melif...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
Can we have some wiki/man/docs on how particular subsystem should
interact with VNET first?
This can probably help to make proper vnet fixes in less number of
attempts :)
For example, even
13 matches
Mail list logo
