Re: [GSoC-Proposal] Porting bhyve on an ARMv8 platform
I had always the impression that there are only a hand full of students to take up a task. But I might be wrong at that. so when given the choice of breaking the rule and let someone do it again vs nobody doing it I know that I would pick. On 25 March 2016 at 14:43, David Wimsey <da...@wimsey.us> wrote: > Because there are other people in the world who want to participate as > well and they deserve a chance too. Not a bad idea for Mihai to try > something different either. > > Its not like they don’t get enough applicants to fill all the slots. > > > > On Mar 25, 2016, at 9:38 AM, Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsja...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I wonder why this rule even exist? Because apparently projects will not > be > > done which seem a bigger issue when someone participating 3 times > > > > On 25 March 2016 at 11:50, Mihai Carabas <mihai.cara...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> Unfortunatelly I have to officially retreat my proposal from GSoC due > >> to the fact that I participated three times in the past and they added > >> a new rule this year (you are not allowed to participate as a student > >> if you have been in the program three times already), so I'm not > >> eligible. > >> > >> I apologize to the FreeBSD organization members that manage the GSoC > >> program because I didn't read carefully this year's rules. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Mihai Carabas > >> > >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Mihai Carabas < > mihai.cara...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> Hi everyone, > >>> > >>> My name is Mihai Carabas and I'm a third year student at PhD in > >>> University POLITEHNICA from Bucharest, Romania. After some discussions > >>> with Peter Grehan about next steps in bhyve-arm, I came with a GSoC > >>> proposal for the project "Porting bhyve an an ARMv8 platform" which is > >>> publicly available here [1]. Any feedback on the proposal would be > >>> great. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Mihai > >>> > >>> [1] > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t4gQ3bc69Zy5QDq1z50BdVkaniZsy47S-Et-hJVwEZE/edit?usp=sharing > >> ___ > >> freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >> freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > >> > > ___ > > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > > ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [GSoC-Proposal] Porting bhyve on an ARMv8 platform
I wonder why this rule even exist? Because apparently projects will not be done which seem a bigger issue when someone participating 3 times On 25 March 2016 at 11:50, Mihai Carabaswrote: > Hi everyone, > > Unfortunatelly I have to officially retreat my proposal from GSoC due > to the fact that I participated three times in the past and they added > a new rule this year (you are not allowed to participate as a student > if you have been in the program three times already), so I'm not > eligible. > > I apologize to the FreeBSD organization members that manage the GSoC > program because I didn't read carefully this year's rules. > > Thank you, > Mihai Carabas > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Mihai Carabas > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > My name is Mihai Carabas and I'm a third year student at PhD in > > University POLITEHNICA from Bucharest, Romania. After some discussions > > with Peter Grehan about next steps in bhyve-arm, I came with a GSoC > > proposal for the project "Porting bhyve an an ARMv8 platform" which is > > publicly available here [1]. Any feedback on the proposal would be > > great. > > > > Thanks, > > Mihai > > > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t4gQ3bc69Zy5QDq1z50BdVkaniZsy47S-Et-hJVwEZE/edit?usp=sharing > ___ > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: VNC server on bhyve
On 17 August 2014 at 21:49, Peter Grehanwrote: > Hi Denis, > > Does (or will include) bhyve VNC server? >> > > For the console, currently not. It will hopefully be there at some point. > > later, > > Peter. > > Old post but is there any item on the road map which implements a VNC server to access the console? For Windows install that would really come handy. ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: BHyVe - ESXi comparison
And lets not forget the head start vmware has (bhyve is what? 1-2 years old?) and the size of it. Less then 1mb in code. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Łukasz Wąsikowski luk...@wasikowski.netwrote: W dniu 2014-01-28 12:18, Andrea Brancatelli pisze: We did a very rough comparison betweend BHyVe and VMWare ESXi. Maybe you want to give it a read and let me know if I did write a bunch of sh!t :-) http://andrea.brancatelli.it/2014/01/28/freebsd-10-0-bhyve-vmware-esxi-5-5-comparison/ I must say I'm very pleased with BHyVe performances! Very good work!! Thanks for your time. You've wrote: BHyVe took 332 seconds VMWare took 313 seconds The difference is about 106.7%. I think that the correct conclusion should state: if we assume VMware's time as a reference than BHyVe was 6.7% slower (not 106.7%). And it should be 6,41% really :) -- best regards, Lukasz Wasikowski ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Linux on BHyVe in 10.0-RELEASE
Could you elaborate what you did to get it working? On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Jonas Bülow jonas.bu...@gmail.com wrote: Success. I have a working ubuntu 13.10 running under bhyve on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE. /J On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Jonas Bülow jonas.bu...@gmail.com wrote: I do use the precanned bhyve-script vm0 (if that is what you mean). It explicitly mentions linux support. bhyveload can't be user for other images than FreeBSD so I don't know how to use your script for a linux OS Since I have not used bhyve-grub personally yet I can not recommend what the correct loader command line but if bhyve-script is in anyway related to vmrun.sh I would be highly suspicious of any command lines you manage to extract from it since they are often not the ones actual called. I assume the image is file backed as I have not assigned a dedicated partition to the vm (and I don't know how to do that). You can keep them anywhere no need for a special volume (mater of fact I was just reusing the name of one of the diretoriess that PC creates during install even without it being a different vol [just assumes any FS boundaries are the host OS's problem)... you can put the disk image any where (your home directory would be fine for example) ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org