Gleb,
Since you did a lot of work in GRN 240233
to fix PF issues, especially for VIMAGE, I thought I would
ask your opinion on the attached patch.
In this post:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2013-July/001405.html
I reported multiple PF-related panics when VIMAGE was
On Saturday 27 July 2013 08:31:48 Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Gleb,
Since you did a lot of work in GRN 240233
to fix PF issues, especially for VIMAGE, I thought I would
ask your opinion on the attached patch.
In this post:
I'm happy keeping it virtual (it lets us do things like set per-vimage
mbuf tag limits, and having per-vimage mbufs may be a useful long term
stretch goal to have).. we just have to think about this stuff in more
detail.
-adrian
___