On 10/11/13 9:56 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 11/10/13 11:42, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Hi,
On May 13, 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Right now the code is in a state where it can be tested by users, so we
would like to encourage FreeBSD and Xen users to test it and
Hi,
On May 13, 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Right now the code is in a state where it can be tested by users, so we
would like to encourage FreeBSD and Xen users to test it and provide
feedback.
any idea if/when this code will be merged into -CURRENT?
Thanks,
On 11/10/13 11:42, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Hi,
On May 13, 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Right now the code is in a state where it can be tested by users, so we
would like to encourage FreeBSD and Xen users to test it and provide
feedback.
any idea if/when this
Hi,
After some more testing I thought it would be good to put this into production
for my personal server. I've used pvhvm_v19 and built it without debugging
options and installed it on a FreeBSD 9.1 system.
I've run into some hiccups with 9.1 user land and a 10-CURRENT kernel, but
that's all
On 22/07/13 09:18, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
Hi,
After some more testing I thought it would be good to put this into
production for my personal server. I've used pvhvm_v19 and built it without
debugging options and installed it on a FreeBSD 9.1 system.
I've run into some hiccups with
Hi,
I have this running for a day or so now, but I'm noticing that the load
averages seem a bit off:
$ uptime
11:17AM up 17:14, 1 user, load averages: 0.31, 0.27, 0.21
This is for a clean install, with just enough installed to compile this kernel.
In top I'm seeing that the machine is idling
On 20/06/13 11:20, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
Hi,
I have this running for a day or so now, but I'm noticing that the load
averages seem a bit off:
$ uptime
11:17AM up 17:14, 1 user, load averages: 0.31, 0.27, 0.21
This is for a clean install, with just enough installed to compile this
On 19 Jun 2013, at 13:34, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Could you provide the boot log of the DomU, backtrace, Xen version and
Dom0 kernel version?
I did not have a console attached when it rebooted, so I did not have a log of
the initial boot. Now that I did, I see that it
On 19/06/13 14:16, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
On 19 Jun 2013, at 13:34, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Could you provide the boot log of the DomU, backtrace, Xen version and
Dom0 kernel version?
I did not have a console attached when it rebooted, so I did not have a log
of
On 19 Jun 2013, at 14:20, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
That's because Justin recently pushed a commit that changed the ad
translation to ada, you should change your /etc/fstab to ada0p2. It's
commit 526f3ad11acb296481215d7c2915b3f30f1844f6.
Ah, you may want to update the wiki
Hi,
On 19 Jun 2013, at 18:15, Justin T. Gibbs gi...@freebsd.org wrote:
I've never seen a kernel build take 2 hours, much less 2 hours *longer*. Are
you talking about buildworld? It would be interesting to know your results
building stable/9 sources in your 10 environment to see if this
On Jun 19, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Jeroen van der Ham jer...@dckd.nl wrote:
Hi,
On 19 Jun 2013, at 18:15, Justin T. Gibbs gi...@freebsd.org wrote:
I've never seen a kernel build take 2 hours, much less 2 hours *longer*.
Are you talking about buildworld? It would be interesting to know your
On 10/06/13 16:48, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello,
I've pushed a new branch, pvhvm_v14 that contains support for live
migration. While there I've also rebased the changes on top of current
HEAD, so now it contains the recent fixes to blkfront and netfront.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.comwrote:
Hello,
I've pushed a new branch, pvhvm_v14 that contains support for live
migration. While there I've also rebased the changes on top of current
HEAD, so now it contains the recent fixes to blkfront and netfront.
On 10/06/13 17:09, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com
mailto:roger@citrix.com wrote:
Hello,
I've pushed a new branch, pvhvm_v14 that contains support for live
migration. While there I've also rebased the
Hi,
On 23 May 2013, at 19:41, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Hello,
I've pushed a new branch, pvhvm_v10 that contains a PV IPI
implementation for both amd64 and i386. I've also updated the wiki to
point to the pvhvm_v10 branch:
I've been running a VM with this kernel for
On 30/05/13 10:50, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
Hi,
On 23 May 2013, at 19:41, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Hello,
I've pushed a new branch, pvhvm_v10 that contains a PV IPI
implementation for both amd64 and i386. I've also updated the wiki to
point to the pvhvm_v10 branch:
Hi,
On 30 May 2013, at 11:04, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
So it looks like the system rebooted (but it was not a crash or a
sporadic reboot? the kernel seems to be aware of the reboot request). It
would be interesting if you could provide the output of the serial
console when
Hi,
On 30 May 2013, at 16:56, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
first is this a public vm ? and if so who is??
May 29 23:42:30 image01 sshd[31227]: error: Received disconnect from
150.165.15.175: 11: Bye Bye [preauth]
because it is after this potential ssh login attempt, so is
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:03:40PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello,
Thanks Matt and Colin for the testing and help! I've pushed yet another
version, now it's branch pvhvm_v12, which I *think* should solve the
issues with cpuid != acpi_id:
On 05/29/13 10:45, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Oh, sure, more changes where needed in order to get it to work, like
using acpi_id to map the vcpu_info and perform the cpu bindings.
Ah, that explains it. I looked at timer.c for other places where that
change was needed but it didn't occur to me that
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@crodrigues.orgwrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com
wrote:
On 23/05/13 15:20, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
On 13 May 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com
wrote:
Also, I've
On 24/05/13 12:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 23/05/13 21:09, Colin Percival wrote:
On 05/23/13 02:06, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 22/05/13 22:03, Colin Percival wrote:
Testing on a cr1.8xlarge EC2 instance, I get Xen 4.2, but it ends up with
a panic -- console output below. I can get a
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 03:21:54PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:41:50PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello,
I've pushed a new branch, pvhvm_v10 that contains a PV IPI
On 05/28/13 12:18, Matt Wilson wrote:
VCPUOP_set_singleshot_timer returns -EINVAL when:
1) the specified vCPU ID is out of range (0 or MAX_VIRT_CPUS)
2) the specified vCPU ID doesn't match the running vCPU.
It seems that there is a confusion between the logical vCPU ID and the
local APIC
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@crodrigues.orgwrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Craig Rodrigues
rodr...@crodrigues.orgwrote:
I wrote this blog post:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@crodrigues.orgwrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.comwrote:
I wrote a blog post specifically for installing 10-CURRENT from a
snapshot ISO and getting bootstrapped
from there, to help the
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 06:15:00PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 24/05/13 12:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Thanks for the test, this is what I expected. I'm a little bit out of
ideas since I'm not able to reproduce this on upstream Xen 4.2. Without
knowing what's happening inside the
Hi,
I've just successfully run FreeBSD 9.1 based guest with 'pvhvm_v8' based kernel
under Xen 4.2.2.
So I couldn't confirm any issue with the kernel both on Xen 3.4.4 and 4.2.2.
Nice Job.
Hypervisor details:
# xm info
host :
release: 3.8.7-1.el6xen
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:41:50PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello,
I've pushed a new branch, pvhvm_v10 that contains a PV IPI
implementation for both amd64 and i386. I've also updated the wiki to
point to the pvhvm_v10 branch:
I feel a bit stupid to ask this, but how I install 'gmake'?
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:41:50PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello,
I've pushed a new branch, pvhvm_v10 that contains a PV IPI
implementation for both amd64 and i386. I've also updated the wiki to
On 24/05/13 16:14, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:41:50PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello,
I've pushed a new branch, pvhvm_v10 that contains a PV IPI
implementation for both amd64 and i386. I've also updated the wiki to
point to the pvhvm_v10 branch:
I feel a
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.comwrote:
On 23/05/13 15:20, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
On 13 May 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Also, I've created a wiki page that explains how to set up a FreeBSD
PVHVM for testing:
On 22/05/13 22:03, Colin Percival wrote:
On 05/22/13 04:45, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 18/05/13 17:44, Colin Percival wrote:
That seems to work. dmesg is attached. Are there any particular tests
you'd like me to run?
I have not tested ZFS, that might be a good one. If you are running this
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Jeroen van der Ham jer...@dckd.nl wrote:
Hi,
On 13 May 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Right now the code is in a state where it can be tested by users, so we
would like to encourage FreeBSD and Xen users to test it and provide
On 23/05/13 15:20, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
On 13 May 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Also, I've created a wiki page that explains how to set up a FreeBSD
PVHVM for testing:
http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Testing_FreeBSD_PVHVM
You mention on that page that it is
On 23/05/13 14:57, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
Hi,
On 13 May 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Right now the code is in a state where it can be tested by users, so we
would like to encourage FreeBSD and Xen users to test it and provide
feedback.
I've just been
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.comwrote:
On 23/05/13 14:57, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
Hi,
On 13 May 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Right now the code is in a state where it can be tested by users, so we
would like to
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.comwrote:
On 23/05/13 14:57, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
Hi,
On 13 May 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Right now the code is in a state where it can be tested by users, so we
would like to
On 23 May 2013 20:30, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.comwrote:
On 23/05/13 14:57, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
Hi,
On 13 May 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Right now the code is in a
On 23/05/13 18:30, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com
mailto:roger@citrix.com wrote:
On 23/05/13 14:57, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
Hi,
On 13 May 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.comwrote:
On 23/05/13 18:30, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com
mailto:roger@citrix.com wrote:
On 23/05/13 14:57, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Just remove this line (or pointing to a similar file from the template: (It's
part of the disks definition:
'file:/root/freebsd-10.iso,hdc:cdrom,r',
Jeroen.
On 23 May 2013, at 19:02, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Roger Pau Monné
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Jeroen van der Ham jer...@dckd.nl wrote:
Hi,
Just remove this line (or pointing to a similar file from the template:
(It's part of the disks definition:
'file:/root/freebsd-10.iso,hdc:cdrom,r',
Thanks, but this is XCP not a generic XEN server where
Hello,
I've pushed a new branch, pvhvm_v10 that contains a PV IPI
implementation for both amd64 and i386. I've also updated the wiki to
point to the pvhvm_v10 branch:
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/royger/freebsd.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/pvhvm_v10
I've updated my tree to latest
On 21/05/13 19:40, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello,
Recently Justin T Gibbs, Will Andrews and myself have been working on
improving the Xen support in FreeBSD. The main goal of this was to bring
full PVHVM support to
On 18/05/13 17:44, Colin Percival wrote:
On 05/18/13 02:50, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 17/05/13 05:07, Colin Percival wrote:
On 05/16/13 17:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Thanks for testing this on EC2, could you post the full dmesg? So I can
see the hypervisor version and if the PV timer is
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:41:02PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 21/05/13 19:40, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello,
Recently Justin T Gibbs, Will Andrews and myself have been working on
improving the Xen support in
On 05/22/13 04:45, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 18/05/13 17:44, Colin Percival wrote:
That seems to work. dmesg is attached. Are there any particular tests
you'd like me to run?
I have not tested ZFS, that might be a good one. If you are running this
on Xen 3.4 the behaviour should be the
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello,
Recently Justin T Gibbs, Will Andrews and myself have been working on
improving the Xen support in FreeBSD. The main goal of this was to bring
full PVHVM support to FreeBSD, right now FreeBSD is only using PV
interfaces
On 17/05/13 05:07, Colin Percival wrote:
On 05/16/13 17:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Thanks for testing this on EC2, could you post the full dmesg? So I can
see the hypervisor version and if the PV timer is loaded or not.
Here's what I get on a cc2.8xlarge with boot_verbose=YES:
I've pushed a
On 05/18/13 02:50, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 17/05/13 05:07, Colin Percival wrote:
On 05/16/13 17:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Thanks for testing this on EC2, could you post the full dmesg? So I can
see the hypervisor version and if the PV timer is loaded or not.
Here's what I get on a
On 05/13/13 11:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Right now the code is in a state where it can be tested by users, so we
would like to encourage FreeBSD and Xen users to test it and provide
feedback.
The code is available in the following git repository, under the branch
pvhvm_v5:
On 16/05/13 19:55, Colin Percival wrote:
On 05/13/13 11:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Right now the code is in a state where it can be tested by users, so we
would like to encourage FreeBSD and Xen users to test it and provide
feedback.
The code is available in the following git repository,
On 05/16/13 17:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Thanks for testing this on EC2, could you post the full dmesg? So I can
see the hypervisor version and if the PV timer is loaded or not.
Here's what I get on a cc2.8xlarge with boot_verbose=YES:
Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]...
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Hello,
Recently Justin T Gibbs, Will Andrews and myself have been working on
improving the Xen support in FreeBSD. The main goal of this was to bring
full PVHVM support to FreeBSD, right now FreeBSD is only using PV
On mar, 2013-05-14 at 10:19 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Hello,
Recently Justin T Gibbs, Will Andrews and myself have been working on
improving the Xen support in FreeBSD. The main goal of this was to bring
full
Hello,
Recently Justin T Gibbs, Will Andrews and myself have been working on
improving the Xen support in FreeBSD. The main goal of this was to bring
full PVHVM support to FreeBSD, right now FreeBSD is only using PV
interfaces for disk and network interfaces when running as a HVM guest.
The main
On 05/13/13 11:52, Michael Sierchio wrote:
I think should be encouraged. We're eagerly awaiting the ability to run
FreeBSD in AWS in something other than t1.micro or cluster compute
instances. Should we keep holding out hope, or will AWS make HVM available
for all instance types before this
The Windoze tax is unacceptable for a number of reasons - the primary
reason is that I'm not running Windows. I don't think the licensing scheme
is unfair for those actually running Windows, mind you.
At the AWS Summit, an assertion was made that HVM support might be coming
soon for all instance
On 05/13/13 12:08, Michael Sierchio wrote:
The Windoze tax is unacceptable for a number of reasons - the primary reason
is
that I'm not running Windows. I don't think the licensing scheme is unfair
for
those actually running Windows, mind you.
Right, it's definitely annoying having to pay
61 matches
Mail list logo
