On Mar 21, 2013, at 6:50 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 21/03/13 13:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On 18/03/13 14:08, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
>>> Hi Roger,
>>>
>>> I know of no reasons why XENHVM cannot use the full event channel
>>> interface. In fact, Spectra Logic implemented PV timers and a
On 21/03/13 13:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 18/03/13 14:08, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> > Hi Roger,
>>
>> I know of no reasons why XENHVM cannot use the full event channel
>> interface. In fact, Spectra Logic implemented PV timers and a
>> general cleanup of the HVM event channel interface. I ha
On 18/03/13 14:08, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> I know of no reasons why XENHVM cannot use the full event channel
> interface. In fact, Spectra Logic implemented PV timers and a
> general cleanup of the HVM event channel interface. I haven't merged
> it back yet because I know the cha
On 18/03/13 14:08, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> While working on improving XENHVM (I've been looking at adding PV
>> timers), I've realized that the event channel implementation in PV vs
>> HVM mode differs greatly. Xen PV port use
On Mar 18, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While working on improving XENHVM (I've been looking at adding PV
> timers), I've realized that the event channel implementation in PV vs
> HVM mode differs greatly. Xen PV port uses sys/xen/evtchn/evtchn.c while
> Xen HVM uses sys
Hello,
While working on improving XENHVM (I've been looking at adding PV
timers), I've realized that the event channel implementation in PV vs
HVM mode differs greatly. Xen PV port uses sys/xen/evtchn/evtchn.c while
Xen HVM uses sys/dev/xenpci/evtchn.c, and the Xen HVM implementation is
greatly re
