Hi Tinker,
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Tinker wrote:
> Hi Neel,
>
> Thank you very much for your response -
>
> That's great!
>
> I guess this should deliver the full capacity for basically any IO system
> around, be it a fast SSD or ramdisk. (Since the guest may not need to flush
> data imm
Hi Neel,
Thank you very much for your response -
That's great!
I guess this should deliver the full capacity for basically any IO
system around, be it a fast SSD or ramdisk. (Since the guest may not
need to flush data immediately to the host, I guess read performance is
the more sensitive po
Hi Tinker,
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Tinker wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For an environment with very heavy parallell IO, should the performance be
> just as good in a BHyVe guest as in the FreeBSD host environment?
>
> What I thought of is that I guess within the host environment, the storage
> subsys
Hi!
For an environment with very heavy parallell IO, should the performance
be just as good in a BHyVe guest as in the FreeBSD host environment?
What I thought of is that I guess within the host environment, the
storage subsystem should have all kinds of optimizations like an
internal work q
